On 11/8/06, Spiegelberg, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merlin,
I'm kinda shocked you had such a bad exp. with the AMS200. We have a
unit here hooked up to a 4-node Linux cluster with 4 databases banging
on it and we get good, consistent perfomance out of it. All 4 nodes can
throw 25 to 75
Hi, Brian,
Brian Hurt wrote:
So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem?
For sequential read performance, use dd. Most variants of dd I've seen
output some timing information, and if not, do a
On 11/8/06, Markus Schaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Brian,
Brian Hurt wrote:
So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem?
For sequential read performance, use dd. Most variants of dd I've
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 11/8/06, Markus Schaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Brian,
Brian Hurt wrote:
So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem?
For sequential read performance, use dd.
Similar experiences with HP and their SmartArray 5i controller on Linux.
The answer was: this controller has won awards for performance! It can't be
slow!, so we made them test it in their own labs an prove just how awfully
slow it was. In the case of the 5i, it became apparent that HP had no
Hi,
Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 21:47, Brian Hurt a écrit :
So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem? I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I
can use that as a comparison
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately,
they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to
weasle out of doing
, November 06, 2006 03:49 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject:[PERFORM] Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around?
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
On 11/6/06, Brian Hurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately,
they're using the fact that bonnie++ is
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:09, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 11/6/06, Brian Hurt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it.
Brian Hurt wrote:
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately,
they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to
11 matches
Mail list logo
