On Friday 25 April 2008 17:32, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but
certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId
which seems to pretty much destroy your thesis, no?
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 25 April 2008 17:32, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but
certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId
which seems to
On Saturday 26 April 2008 13:26, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 25 April 2008 17:32, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different,
but certainly doesn't have concerns about
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 26 April 2008 13:26, Tom Lane wrote:
Oh, you failed to state that the dtrace output was post-patch. You need
to show *pre* patch dtrace output if you want us to think it relevant.
Please read up-thread.
Sorry, I'd forgotten your previous
On Monday 21 April 2008 12:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
Unfortunatly I don't have the 8.1 system to bang on anymore for this,
(though anecdotaly speaking, I never saw this behavior in 8.1) however I
do now have a parallel 8.3 system crunching the data, and it is showing
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but
certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId
... which seems to pretty much destroy your thesis, no?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent
On Thursday 27 March 2008 17:11, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 16 March 2008 22:18, Tom Lane wrote:
Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary
search instead
of linear search when checking child-transaction XIDs.
Are there
Robert Treat wrote:
Unfortunatly I don't have the 8.1 system to bang on anymore for this, (though
anecdotaly speaking, I never saw this behavior in 8.1) however I do now have
a parallel 8.3 system crunching the data, and it is showing the same symptom
(yes, 2 8.3 servers, crunching the
