On 26.02.2015 13:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 02/26/2015 12:31 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 02/14/2015 10:35 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Thanks for the immediate reply.
I understand the use case is quite limited.
On the other hand, I see potential when it comes to applications which
use
On 26.02.2015 13:48, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 13:23:
If you think Reverse Key Indexes have no usage here in PostgreSQL, you should
not support convenience features
for easily improving performance without breaking the querying API
Sorry for my bad
On 02/26/2015 12:31 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 02/14/2015 10:35 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Thanks for the immediate reply.
I understand the use case is quite limited.
On the other hand, I see potential when it comes to applications which
use PostgreSQL. There, programmers would have to change a
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 13:23:
If you think Reverse Key Indexes have no usage here in PostgreSQL, you should
not support convenience features
for easily improving performance without breaking the querying API
It's also unclear to me which performance you are referring to.
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 12:04:
I just thought about btree indexes here mainly because they well-known and
well-used in ORM frameworks.
If your ORM framework needs to know about the internals of an index definition
or even requires a certain index type, then you should ditch
On 25.02.2015 23:31, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 02/14/2015 10:35 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Thanks for the immediate reply.
I understand the use case is quite limited.
On the other hand, I see potential when it comes to applications which
use PostgreSQL. There, programmers would have to change a lot
On 26.02.2015 12:45, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Sven R. Kunze schrieb am 26.02.2015 um 12:04:
I just thought about btree indexes here mainly because they well-known and
well-used in ORM frameworks.
If your ORM framework needs to know about the internals of an index definition
or even requires a
On 02/14/2015 10:35 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
Thanks for the immediate reply.
I understand the use case is quite limited.
On the other hand, I see potential when it comes to applications which
use PostgreSQL. There, programmers would have to change a lot of code to
tweak existing (and more
Sven R. Kunze srku...@tbz-pariv.de writes:
does PostgreSQL support the concept of reverse key indexing as described
here? I couldn't find any documentation on this yet.
http://www.toadworld.com/platforms/oracle/w/wiki/11075.reverse-key-index-from-the-concept-to-internals.aspx
There's nothing
Hi,
does PostgreSQL support the concept of reverse key indexing as described
here? I couldn't find any documentation on this yet.
http://www.toadworld.com/platforms/oracle/w/wiki/11075.reverse-key-index-from-the-concept-to-internals.aspx
Regards,
--
Sven R. Kunze
TBZ-PARIV GmbH, Bernsdorfer
Thanks for the immediate reply.
I understand the use case is quite limited.
On the other hand, I see potential when it comes to applications which
use PostgreSQL. There, programmers would have to change a lot of code to
tweak existing (and more importantly working) queries to hash/reverse an
11 matches
Mail list logo
