Title: RE: [PERFORM] SQL Function Performance
in my case; both direct query and sql function gererate same execution plan. Also, execution plan belongs to the sql function better than direct sql query plan. But, direct sql result comes less than 1 second. sql function result comes about
From: Michael Fuhr
Date: 02/14/06 03:32:28
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Adnan DURSUN; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] SQL
Function Performance
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
"Adnan DURSUN" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE EX
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Adnan DURSUN wrote:
- Nested Loop (cost=5.90..267.19 rows=3 width=101) (actual
time=76.240..30974.777 rows=63193 loops=1)
- Nested Loop (cost=5.90..123.48 rows=26 width=73) (actual
time=32.082..4357.786 rows=14296 loops=1)
---Original Message---
From: Michael Fuhr
Date: 02/14/06 23:05:55
To: Adnan DURSUN
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] SQL
Function Performance
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Adnan DURSUN wrote:
-Nested Loop(cost=5.90..267.19 rows=3 width=101
From: Michael Fuhr
Date: 02/13/06
07:46:05
To: Adnan DURSUN
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM]
SQL Function Performance
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:25:28PM +0200, Adnan DURSUN wrote:
My database has an SQL
From: Michael Fuhr
Date: 02/13/06
07:46:05
To: Adnan DURSUN
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] SQL
Function Performance
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:25:28PM +0200, Adnan DURSUN wrote:
My database has an SQL function. The result comes in 30
From: Mark
Liberman
Date: 02/13/06
22:09:48
To: Adnan DURSUN; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [PERFORM]
SQL Function Performance
I've run into this issue. It basically comes down to the
plan that is being used inside the function is not the same as the plan used
when you
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:57:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Adnan DURSUN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE stmt (...);
Here is the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for prepared statement :
This is exactly the same as the other plan --- you did not parameterize
the query. To see
Hi
all,
My
databasehasan SQL function. The result comes in 30-40 seconds
when i use the SQL function. On the other hand; The result comes
300-400 milliseconds when
irun
If you have only recently analyzed the tables in the query, close your psql
session (if that's what you were using) and then restart it. I've gotten burned
by asking a query using the function, which I believe is when PG creates the
plan for the function, and then making significant changes to
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:25:28PM +0200, Adnan DURSUN wrote:
My database has an SQL function. The result comes in 30-40 seconds
when i use the SQL function. On the other hand; The result comes
300-400 milliseconds when i run the SQL statement. Any idea ??
Have you analyzed the tables? If
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:54:58PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have a SQL function like :
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
fn_get_yetkili_inisyer_listesi(int4, int4)
RETURNS SETOF kod_adi_liste_type AS
$BODY$
SELECT Y.KOD,Y.ADI
FROM T_YER Y
WHERE EXISTS
Hi All,
I have a SQL function like :
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
fn_get_yetkili_inisyer_listesi(int4, int4)
RETURNS SETOF kod_adi_liste_type AS
$BODY$
SELECT Y.KOD,Y.ADI
FROM T_YER Y
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM T_GUZER G
WHERE (G.BIN_YER_KOD = $1 OR
13 matches
Mail list logo
