On 08/24/2012 05:47 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
Hello List,
I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @
2.00GHz Processor (HP Proliant)
It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
The Postgres Performance on this system measured with pgbench
Hello List,
I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @ 2.00GHz
Processor (HP Proliant)
It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
The Postgres Performance on this system measured with pgbench is very poor:
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
Hello List,
I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @ 2.00GHz
Processor (HP Proliant)
It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
The Postgres Performance on this system measured with pgbench is very poor:
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Felix Schubert in...@fescon.de wrote:
Hello List,
I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @ 2.00GHz
Processor (HP Proliant)
It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
The Postgres Performance on this
Hi Scott,
the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Felix Schubert
Von meinem iPhone gesendet :-)
Am 25.08.2012 um 14:42 schrieb Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Felix Schubert in...@fescon.de wrote:
Hello
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Felix Schubert in...@fescon.de wrote:
Hi Scott,
the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Felix Schubert in...@fescon.de wrote:
Hi Scott,
the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
it, am I right?
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
Don't know but I forwarded the question to the System Administrator.
Anyhow thanks for the information up to now!
best regards,
Felix
Am 25.08.2012 um 14:59 schrieb Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com:
Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
it, am I right?
No problem, hope it helps. The single most important part of any
fast, transactional server is the RAID controller and its cache.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Felix Schubert in...@fescon.de wrote:
Don't know but I forwarded the question to the System Administrator.
Anyhow thanks for the
