I'd try to check why discounts are different. Join with 'or' should work.
Build (one query) except all (another query) and check some rows from
result.
13 лип. 2013 01:28, Brian Fehrle bri...@consistentstate.com напис.
On 07/11/2013 06:46 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Brian,
3. I'm trying to
On 07/12/2013 04:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
As for the counts on the tables:
table1 3,653,472
table2 2,191,314
table325,676,589
I think it's safe to assume right now that any resulting joins are not
one-to-one
Hmmm? How is doing a subselect in the SELECT clause even working,
-performance@postgresql.org
Betreff: Re: [PERFORM] Trying to eliminate union and sort
On 07/12/2013 04:43 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
As for the counts on the tables:
table1 3,653,472
table2 2,191,314
table325,676,589
I think it's safe to assume right now that any resulting joins
On 07/11/2013 06:46 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Brian,
3. I'm trying to eliminate the union, however I have two problems.
A) I can't figure out how to have an 'or' clause in a single join that
would fetch all the correct rows. If I just do:
LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2 ON (t2.real_id = t.id OR
As for the counts on the tables:
table1 3,653,472
table2 2,191,314
table325,676,589
I think it's safe to assume right now that any resulting joins are not
one-to-one
Hmmm? How is doing a subselect in the SELECT clause even working, then?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
Hi All,
(basic info)
PostgreSQL 9.2.4
64 bit Linux host
4GB shared_buffers with 14GB system memory, dedicated database VM
10MB work_mem
I have a query that takes over 6 minutes to complete, and it's due
mainly to the two sorting operations being done on this query. The data
it is returning
Brian,
3. I'm trying to eliminate the union, however I have two problems.
A) I can't figure out how to have an 'or' clause in a single join that
would fetch all the correct rows. If I just do:
LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2 ON (t2.real_id = t.id OR t2.real_id =
t.backup_id), I end up with many
