On Dec 6, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Ameet Kini wrote:
table with only 1 index, the time to do a vacuum (without full)
went down
from 45 minutes to under 3 minutes. Maybe thats not bloat but thats
surely surprising. And this was after running vacuum periodically.
I'll bet either your FSM settings
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 04:03:22PM -0600, Ameet Kini wrote:
I'm running postgresql v8.0 and my problem is that running vacuum on my
indices are blazing fast (upto 10x faster) AFTER running reindex. For a
table with only 1 index, the time to do a vacuum (without full) went down
from 45 minutes to
> what evidence do you have that you are suffering index bloat? or are
> you just looking for solutions to problems that don't exist as an
> academic exercise? :-)
Well, firstly, its not an academic exercise - Its very much of a real
problem that needs a real solution :)
I'm running postgresql
Tom Lane wrote:
Alan Stange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vivek Khera wrote:
what evidence do you have that you are suffering index bloat?
The files for the two indices on a single table used 7.8GB of space
before a reindex, and 4.4GB after.
That's not bloat ... that's
Alan Stange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
>> what evidence do you have that you are suffering index bloat?
> The files for the two indices on a single table used 7.8GB of space
> before a reindex, and 4.4GB after.
That's not bloat ... that's pretty nearly in line with the norm
Ameet Kini schrieb:
This didn't get through the first time around, so resending it again.
Sorry for any duplicate entries.
Hello,
I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
of my tables.
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Ameet Kini wrote:
need for vacuums. However, it'd be great if there was a similar
automatic
reindex utility, like say, a pg_autoreindex daemon. Are there any plans
for this feature? If not, then would cron scripts be the next best
what eviden
On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Ameet Kini wrote:
need for vacuums. However, it'd be great if there was a similar
automatic
reindex utility, like say, a pg_autoreindex daemon. Are there any
plans
for this feature? If not, then would cron scripts be the next best
what evidence do you have th
Hello,
I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
of my tables. However, its noted in the docs (e.g.
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/routine-reindex.html)
and on the lists here t
On Dec 6, 2005, at 12:44 PM, Ameet Kini wrote:
I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full)
on all
of my tables. However, its noted in the docs (e.g.
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/r
Ameet Kini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
> vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
> of my tables. However, its noted in the docs (e.g.
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/routine-
This didn't get through the first time around, so resending it again.
Sorry for any duplicate entries.
Hello,
I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
of my tables. However, its noted in th
12 matches
Mail list logo
