Dear all
Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE
used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS 320GB
15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EVO 500GB.
My DBMS parameters presents in postgresql.conf is default, but
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Neto pr wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE
> used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
>
> I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS 320GB
> 15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EV
Thanks for the reply.
I'll try upload the execution plan with Explain (analyse, buffer) for
website: https://explain.depesz.com/
I'm make an experiment for a scientific research and this is what I
find strange, explaining better, strange HDD performance far outweigh
the performance of an SSD.
Do
2018-01-14 13:40 GMT-08:00 Justin Pryzby :
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Neto pr wrote:
>> Dear all
>>
>> Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE
>> used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1].
>>
>> I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Mem
2018-01-14 15:59 GMT-08:00 Neto pr :
> Thanks for the reply.
> I'll try upload the execution plan with Explain (analyse, buffer) for
> website: https://explain.depesz.com/
>
Below is a new execution plan, with Analyze, BUFFERS. This time,
without changing anything in the configuration of the DBMS
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 06:25:40PM -0800, Neto pr wrote:
> > The query plan is all garbled by mail , could you resend? Or post a link
> > from
> > https://explain.depesz.com/
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 06:36:02PM -0800, Neto pr wrote:
> I was not able to upload to the site, because I'm saving the e
