Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 18:18, Mike Schanne a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> This question is somewhat related to my previous question:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0871fcf35ceb4caa8a2204ca9c38e330%40USEPRDEX1.corp.kns.com
>
>
>
> I was attempting to measure the benefit of doing a VACUUM
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:39:38PM +, Fahiz Mohamed wrote:
> Thank you very much for your prompt responses.
>
> I have analysed more regarding this and found the long running query.
>
> I ran "explain analyse" on this query and I got following result. (We have 2
> identical DB instances and
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:43 AM Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
This query uses the column statistics to estimate bloat. AFAIK, json
> columns don't have statistics, so the estimation can't be relied on (for
> this specific table at least).
>
This was true prior to 9.5 (for xml at least, I don't know
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:39 PM Fahiz Mohamed wrote:
> I ran "explain analyse" on this query and I got following result. (We have
> 2 identical DB instances and they consist of same data. Instane 1 took 20+
> second to process and instance 2 took less than a second)
>
> Instance 1: (This is used
Thank you very much for your prompt responses.
I have analysed more regarding this and found the long running query.
I ran "explain analyse" on this query and I got following result. (We have 2
identical DB instances and they consist of same data. Instane 1 took 20+ second
to process and
