On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:18:19PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> I've taken a look and managed to cut out quite a bit of used time.
> You'll need to confirm it's the same results though (I didn't -- it is
> the same number of results (query below)
It looks very much like the same results.
> Secondly
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 06:04, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:18:19PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > I've taken a look and managed to cut out quite a bit of used time.
> > You'll need to confirm it's the same results though (I didn't -- it is
> > the same number of results (qu
Rod Taylor wrote:
Lets start with an example. Please send us an EXPLAIN ANALYZE of a
couple of the poorly performing queries.
thanks for your answer. the problem was solved by using FULL(!) VACUUM.
regards,
Stefan
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have
Hi all,
I was wondering if part or all of Postgres would be able to take
advantage of a beowulf cluster to increase performance? If not then why
not, and if so then how would/could it benefit from being on a cluster?
Thanks for the enlightenment in advance.
-Joe
--
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 14:45, joe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was wondering if part or all of Postgres would be able to take
> advantage of a beowulf cluster to increase performance? If not then why
> not, and if so then how would/could it benefit from being on a cluster?
>
> Thanks for the e
You might want to take a look at Matt Dillon's Backplane database. It is
designed to work in a multi-node environment :
http://www.backplane.com/
regards
Mark
joe wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if part or all of Postgres would be able to take
advantage of a beowulf cluster to increase per
