00 rows=1000
width=54) (actual time=0.060..3.653 rows=2797 loops=1)
Total runtime: 39094.713 ms
(10 rows)
Thanks!
-Clark
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
> When I give "mount" at the command line, everything looks just fine :
>
> /dev/sda2 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime,data=ordered)
> none on /proc type proc (rw)
> usbdevfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw)
> /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext3 (rw,noatime,data=ordered)
> none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gi
I'm running a server with lots of counts and calculations.
currently its ubuntu server is freebsd faster?
also this is a i386 machine.
or linux and bsd is about the same.
this is not to be an argument just looking. Current benchmarks to compare
thanks
Rodrigo Madera wrote:
I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
a database.
I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
2) Store each frame in a separate record in the
If memory serves me correctly I have seen several posts about this in
the past.
I'll try to recall highlights.
1. Create a md in linux sufficiently large enough to handle the data set
you are wanting to store.
2. Create a HD based copy somewhere as your permanent storage mechanism.
3. Start u
