Re: [PERFORM] Any 7.4 w32 numbers in yet?

[Bruce Momjian]

Jason Hihn wrote:
> I am very interested in the non-Cygwin windows port. Looking over the 7.4
> beta release, it looks like the code made it in. I read through the win32
> related docs, to find out that they are out-of date instructions (11/2002).
> I do hope these get updated with the native windows stuff.
> 
> But I came here to ask more about the performance of pg-w32. Did it take a
> hit? Is it faster (than Cygwin, than Unix)? Stability? I saw there were some
> mailings about file-moving race conditions, links and such.

See:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html

We don't have it running yet.  It will be running in 7.5.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

[PERFORM] Any 7.4 w32 numbers in yet?

[Jason Hihn]

I am very interested in the non-Cygwin windows port. Looking over the 7.4
beta release, it looks like the code made it in. I read through the win32
related docs, to find out that they are out-of date instructions (11/2002).
I do hope these get updated with the native windows stuff.

But I came here to ask more about the performance of pg-w32. Did it take a
hit? Is it faster (than Cygwin, than Unix)? Stability? I saw there were some
mailings about file-moving race conditions, links and such.

Thanks.

Jason Hihn
Paytime Payroll



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly