On 15/09/2003 08:42 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Is it possible to follow data type upgrade model in planner? Something
like in
C/C++ where data types are promoted upwards to find out better plan?
int2-int4-int8-float4-float8 types.
That could be a clean solution..
just a thought..
Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 15/09/2003 08:42 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Is it possible to follow data type upgrade model in planner?
We have one, more or less. It's not explicitly coded, it emerges from
the fact that certain casts are implicit and others are not. For
instance,
On 10 Sep 2003 at 22:44, Tom Lane wrote:
James Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this just a dead end, or is there some variation of this that might
possibly work, so that ultimately an undoctored literal number, when
applied to an int8 column, could find an index?
I think it's
Hello,
I'm trying a work-around on the index on int8 column gets ignored by
planner when queried by literal numbers lacking the explicit '::int8'
issue, and had hoped that perhaps I could create a functional index on
the result of casting the pk field to int4, and mabye with a little
James Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this just a dead end, or is there some variation of this that might
possibly work, so that ultimately an undoctored literal number, when
applied to an int8 column, could find an index?
I think it's a dead end. What I was playing with this
