Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Tom Lane wrote: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NOT EXISTS is taking almost double time than NOT IN . I know IN has been optimised in 7.4 but is anything wrong with the NOT EXISTS? That's the expected behavior in 7.4. EXISTS in the style you are using i

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Treat
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 12:00, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does the not exist query produce worse results in 7.4 than it did in > > 7.3? > > EXISTS should work the same as before. > right. the original poster is asking if there is "something wrong with exist" bas

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does the not exist query produce worse results in 7.4 than it did in > 7.3? EXISTS should work the same as before. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Robert Treat
It is believed that the IN optimization can lead to faster IN times than EXIST times on some queries, the extent of which is still a bit of an unknown. (Incidentally is there an FAQ item on this that needs updating?) Does the not exist query produce worse results in 7.4 than it did in 7.3? Robert

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Robert Treat wrote: It is believed that the IN optimization can lead to faster IN times than EXIST times on some queries, the extent of which is still a bit of an unknown. (Incidentally is there an FAQ item on this that needs updating?) Thanks every one for clarifying. Its really a nice

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote: > > Hi, > > NOT EXISTS is taking almost double time than NOT IN . > I know IN has been optimised in 7.4 but is anything > wrong with the NOT EXISTS? > > I have vaccumed , analyze and run the query many times > still not in is faster than exists :> Seems fine. In 7.4

Re: [PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
Rajesh Kumar Mallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > NOT EXISTS is taking almost double time than NOT IN . > I know IN has been optimised in 7.4 but is anything > wrong with the NOT EXISTS? That's the expected behavior in 7.4. EXISTS in the style you are using it effectively forces a nestloop-with-

[PERFORM] IN surpasses NOT EXISTS in 7.4RC2 ??

2003-11-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Hi, NOT EXISTS is taking almost double time than NOT IN . I know IN has been optimised in 7.4 but is anything wrong with the NOT EXISTS? I have vaccumed , analyze and run the query many times still not in is faster than exists :> Regds Mallah. NOT IN PLAN tradein_clients=# explain analyze S