-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rod Taylor wrote:
| I've used both a NetApp and Hitachi based SANs with PostgreSQL. Both
| work as well as expected, but do require some tweeking as they normally
| are not optimized for the datablock size that PostgreSQL likes to deal
| with (8k by
Rod Taylor wrote:
| I've used both a NetApp and Hitachi based SANs with PostgreSQL. Both
| work as well as expected, but do require some tweeking as they normally
| are not optimized for the datablock size that PostgreSQL likes to deal
| with (8k by default) -- this can make as much as a 50%
Andrew Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My goal is to tune the disk / filesystem on our prototype system. It's
an EMC disk array, so sectors on disk are 512 bytes of usable space.
We've decided to go with RAID 10 since the goal is to maximize
performance. Currently the raid element size is
Hi all,
I've been searching the list for a while but couldn't find any up-to-date information relating to my problem.
We have a production server with postgresql on cygwin that currently deels with about 200 Gigs of data (1 big IDE drive). We plan to move to linux for some reasons I don't have
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've been searching the list for a while but couldn't find any
up-to-date information relating to my problem.
We have a production server with postgresql on cygwin that currently
deels with about 200 Gigs of data (1 big IDE
.
Benjamin.
Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé par : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20/07/2004 10:20
Pour :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet :Re: [PERFORM] NAS, SAN or any alternate solution ?
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've
.
Regards,
Benjamin.
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20/07/2004 12:04
Pour :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet :Re: Réf. : Re: [PERFORM] NAS, SAN or any alternate solution ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we don't plan to have more than 5 connections
...and on Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:52:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] used the keyboard:
Hi all,
I've been searching the list for a while but couldn't find any up-to-date
information relating to my problem.
We have a production server with postgresql on cygwin that currently deels
with about
Oh, and not to forget - the price for a 3ware 9500S-12, the version
we're testing ranges between EUR1000 and EUR1500, depending on the
contract you have with the reseller and the intended use of the
device. SATA disks are dirt-cheap nowadays, as has been mentioned
before.
Correction,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would NAS or SAN be good solutions ? (I've read that NAS uses NFS which
could slow down the transfer rate ??)
Has anyone ever tried one of these with postgresql ?
Not (yet) with Postgres, but my company has run ~100GB Oracle database
on NAS (NetApp) for the past couple
10 matches
Mail list logo
