"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Add a small cost factor to ensure we
>> prefer materializing the smaller input. This changes several
>> regression test plans, but with any luck we will now have more
>> stability across platforms.
> No. The planner is not a facto
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I took advantage of the holidays to update a production server (dual
> > Opteron on win2k) from an 11/16 build (about beta5 or so) to the
latest
> > release candidate. No configuration changes were made, just a
binary
> > swap and
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I took advantage of the holidays to update a production server (dual
> Opteron on win2k) from an 11/16 build (about beta5 or so) to the latest
> release candidate. No configuration changes were made, just a binary
> swap and a server stop/start.
>
I took advantage of the holidays to update a production server (dual
Opteron on win2k) from an 11/16 build (about beta5 or so) to the latest
release candidate. No configuration changes were made, just a binary
swap and a server stop/start.
I was shocked to see that statement latency dropped by
