Re: [PERFORM] Any issues with my tuning...

2003-10-14 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:43, David Griffiths wrote: > Here are part of the contents of my sysctl.conf file (note that I've > played with values as low as 60 with no difference) > kernel.shmmax=14 > kernel.shmall=14 This is only a system-wide limit -- it either allows the share

Re: [PERFORM] Any issues with my tuning...

2003-10-13 Thread Josh Berkus
David, > shared_buffers = 96000 # min max_connections*2 or 16, 8KB each This seems a little high to me, even for 2gb RAM. What % of your available RAM does it work out to? > effective_cache_size = 6000 # typically 8KB each This is very, very low. Given your hardware, I'd set it

Re: [PERFORM] Any issues with my tuning...

2003-10-13 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:43, David Griffiths wrote: > I've been having performance issues with Postgres (sequential scans vs > index scans in an update statement). I've read that optimizer will > change it's plan based on the resources it thinks are available. In > addition, I've read alot of confl