The first part of the article can be found in
http://www.sqlmagazine.com.br/colunistas.asp?artigo=Colunistas/RicardoRezende/06_Raid_P1.asp
The site seems to be down. I was looking forward to reading it. :(
The first and most important step for RAID performance with PostgreSQL is to
get a
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:10:13AM -0700, Daniel Ceregatti wrote:
Here is a small example of the performance difference with write cache:
http://sh.nu/bonnie.txt
Am I missing something here? I can't find any tests with the same machine
showing the difference between writeback and
Primer,
The site seems to be down. I was looking forward to reading it. :(
I didn't have a problem. The site *is* in Portuguese, though.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain
Josh Berkus wrote:
Primer,
The site seems to be down. I was looking forward to reading it. :(
I didn't have a problem. The site *is* in Portuguese, though.
Yes, it came up finally. Fortunately I'm Brazilian. :)
--
Daniel Ceregatti - Programmer
Omnis Network,
Hi, there,
I am running PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on MAC OS X G5 with dual processors and
8GB memory. The shared buffer was set as 512MB.
The database has been running great until about 10 days ago when our
developers decided to add some indexes to some tables to speed up
certain uploading ops.
Now the CPU
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:50:33AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
The second step is to have lots of disks; 5 drives is a minimum for really
good performance. 3-drive RAID5, in particular, is a poor performer for
PostgreSQL, often resulting in I/O that is 40% or less as efficient as a
single
Jim,
What about benefits from putting WAL and pg_temp on seperate drives?
Specifically, we have a box with 8 drives, 2 in a mirror with the OS and
WAL and pg_temp; the rest in a raid10 with the database on it. Do you
think it would have been better to make one big raid10? What if it was
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 02:07:37PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Jim,
What about benefits from putting WAL and pg_temp on seperate drives?
Specifically, we have a box with 8 drives, 2 in a mirror with the OS and
WAL and pg_temp; the rest in a raid10 with the database on it. Do you
think it
