Christopher Browne wrote:
> After a long battle with technology, Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, an
> earthling, wrote:
>
>>JM wrote:
>>
>>>Hi ALL,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there is a DB performance reduction if
>>>there are a lot of IDLE processes.
>>>
>>>30786 ?S 0:00 po
After a long battle with technology, Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, an
earthling, wrote:
> JM wrote:
>> Hi ALL,
>>
>> I was wondering if there is a DB performance reduction if
>> there are a lot of IDLE processes.
>>
>> 30786 ?S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
JM wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I was wondering if there is a DB performance reduction if there are a
> lot of
> IDLE processes.
>
> 30786 ?S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 32504 ?S 0:00 postgres: user1 gmadb 10.10.10.1 idle
> 32596 ?S 0:00 pos
JM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if there is a DB performance reduction if there are a
> lot of
> IDLE processes.
There will be some overhead, but I dunno if anyone's ever tried to
measure it.
regards, tom lane
---(end of br
