On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 04:27 +0530, raghavendra t wrote:
I'm sorry I couldn't come up with more, but what you've
provided so
far is roughly equivalent to me telling you that it takes over
four
hours to travel to see my Uncle Jim, and then asking you how
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:47 AM, raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
and deletes. We also has the weekly maintance of VACUUM, but still reindex
takes lot of time.
If you only VACUUM once a week, *everything* is going to take a lot of time.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-performance
On 03/31/2010 11:11 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:33 PM, raghavendra t
raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome with a
raghavendra t wrote:
1. What are the parameters will effect, when issuing the REINDEX command
2. Best possible way to increase the spead of the REINDEX
If you haven't done the usual general tuning on your server, that might
help. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a
maintenance measure with 8.3.7 on FreeBSD.
Sometimes it's better to have indexes with some space in them so every
insert doesn't hit a full index page and triggers a page split to make
some space.
Of course if the index is
Hi All,
System Config
-
CPU - Intel® Xenon® CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
Steve:
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a maintenance
measure with 8.3.7 on FreeBSD.
My question is something like Steve's, why
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:17 +0530, raghavendra t wrote:
Hi All,
System Config
-
CPU - Intel® Xenon® CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
Steve:
So am I to understand I don't need to do daily reindexing as a
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
System Config
-
CPU - Intel* Xenon* CPU
CPU Speed - 3.16 GHz
Server Model - Sun Fire X4150
RAM-Size - 16GB
The disk system matters a lot, too. How many drives do you have in
what RAID configuration(s)?
My question is
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
I have a table with 40GB size, it has few indexes on it.
What does the table look like? What indexes are there?
When i try to REINDEX on the table,
Why are you doing that?
its take a long time.
How long?
I tried increasing the
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for the update,
What does the table look like? What indexes are there?
Table has a combination of byteas. Indexes are b-tree and Partial
Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
overcome with a corrupted index.
If this is a one-time fix for a corrupted index, did you look at
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY? You could avoid any down time while you
fix things up.
If this is a one-time fix for a corrupted index, did you look at
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY? You could avoid any down time while you
fix things up.
Using CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY will avoid the exclusive locks on the table,
but my question is, how to get a performance on the existing
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
my question is, how to get a performance on the existing indexes.
You mean to say , drop the existing indexes and create the index
with CONCURRENTLY. Does this give the performance back.
You would normally want to create first and then drop the
Thank you for the suggestion.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.govwrote:
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
my question is, how to get a performance on the existing indexes.
You mean to say , drop the existing indexes and create the index
raghavendra t raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion.
I'm sorry I couldn't come up with more, but what you've provided so
far is roughly equivalent to me telling you that it takes over four
hours to travel to see my Uncle Jim, and then asking you how I can
find out how
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:33 PM, raghavendra t
raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome with a corrupted index.
do you have a corrupted index? if not, there is
I'm sorry I couldn't come up with more, but what you've provided so
far is roughly equivalent to me telling you that it takes over four
hours to travel to see my Uncle Jim, and then asking you how I can
find out how he's doing in less time than that. There's just not
much to go on. :-(
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:33 PM, raghavendra t
raagavendra@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome with a corrupted index.
do you have a corrupted
18 matches
Mail list logo
