Thanks for the explanation. So what sort of changes need to be made to
the client/server protocol to fix this problem?
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:22:15 -0500 (EST), Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Stephen Crowley wrote:
>
> > Problem solved.. I set the fetchSize t
Problem solved.. I set the fetchSize to a reasonable value instead of
the default of unlimited in the PreparedStatement and now the query
is . After some searching it seeems this is a common problem, would it
make sense to change the default value to something other than 0 in
the JDBC driver?
If
Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:11:07 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Does postgres cache the entire result set before it begins returning
>>> data to the client?
>>
>> The backend doesn't, but libpq
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:11:07 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does postgres cache the entire result set before it begins returning
> > data to the client?
>
> The backend doesn't, but libpq does, and I think JDBC does too.
>
> I'd recomm
Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does postgres cache the entire result set before it begins returning
> data to the client?
The backend doesn't, but libpq does, and I think JDBC does too.
I'd recommend using a cursor so you can FETCH a reasonable number of
rows at a time.
> Also, wh
