Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting -- I wonder if it would be possible for the optimizer to
detect this and avoid the redundant inner sort ... (/me muses to
himself)
I think the ability to generate two sort steps is a feature, not a bug.
This has been often requested in
The only thing you're adding to the query is a second SORT step, so it
shouldn't require any more time/memory than the query's first SORT
did.
Interesting -- I wonder if it would be possible for the optimizer to
detect this and avoid the redundant inner sort ... (/me muses to
himself)
That's
