On 09/11/2011 06:44 PM, Anthony Presley wrote:
We've currently got PG 8.4.4 running on a whitebox hardware set up,
with (2) 5410 Xeon's, and 16GB of RAM. It's also got (4) 7200RPM SATA
drives, using the onboard IDE controller and ext3.
A few weeks back, we purchased two refurb'd HP DL360's
On 12-9-2011 0:44 Anthony Presley wrote:
A few weeks back, we purchased two refurb'd HP DL360's G5's, and were
hoping to set them up with PG 9.0.2, running replicated. These machines
have (2) 5410 Xeon's, 36GB of RAM, (6) 10k SAS drives, and are using the
HP SA P400i with 512MB of BBWC. PG is
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Arjen van der Meijden
acmmail...@tweakers.net wrote:
On 12-9-2011 0:44 Anthony Presley wrote:
A few weeks back, we purchased two refurb'd HP DL360's G5's, and were
hoping to set them up with PG 9.0.2, running replicated. These machines
have (2) 5410
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 12.9.2011 00:44, Anthony Presley napsal(a):
We've currently got PG 8.4.4 running on a whitebox hardware set up,
with (2) 5410 Xeon's, and 16GB of RAM. It's also got (4) 7200RPM
SATA drives, using the onboard IDE
So, today, I did the following:
- Swapped out the 5410's (2.3Ghz) for 5470's (3.33Ghz)
- Set the ext4 mount options to be noatime,barrier=0,data=writeback
- Installed PG 9.1 from the yum repo
Item one:
With the accelerator cache set to 0/100 (all 512MB for writing), loading
the db /
On 12/09/11 15:10, mark wrote:
From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Presley
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 4:45 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?
* Anthony Presley (anth...@resolution.com) wrote:
I was really hoping that with hardware RAID that something would be faster
(loading times, queries, etc...). What am I doing wrong?
ext3 and ext4 do NOT perform identically out of the box.. You might be
running into the write barriers problem
Dne 12.9.2011 00:44, Anthony Presley napsal(a):
We've currently got PG 8.4.4 running on a whitebox hardware set up,
with (2) 5410 Xeon's, and 16GB of RAM. It's also got (4) 7200RPM
SATA drives, using the onboard IDE controller and ext3.
A few weeks back, we purchased two refurb'd HP DL360's
On September 11, 2011 03:44:34 PM Anthony Presley wrote:
First thing I noticed is that it takes the same amount of time to load the
db (about 40 minutes) on the new hardware as the old hardware. I was
really hoping with the faster, additional drives and a hardware RAID
controller, that this
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Anthony Presley anth...@resolution.com wrote:
We've currently got PG 8.4.4 running on a whitebox hardware set up, with (2)
5410 Xeon's, and 16GB of RAM. It's also got (4) 7200RPM SATA drives, using
the onboard IDE controller and ext3.
A few weeks back, we
From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Presley
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 4:45 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] RAID Controller (HP P400) beat by SW-RAID?
We've currently got PG 8.4.4
11 matches
Mail list logo
