http://mail.sth.sze.hu/~hsz/sql/
New, upgraded test results. As we see, the developers works hard, and with
good results. Million thanks and congratulations.
Sorry *BSD-lovers, if you send a new hard drive, our tester can do bsd
tests also. Life is hard.
And last, but not least, thanks for the
Nicely done!
Thanks,
Balazs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomka
Gergely
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Tests
http://mail.sth.sze.hu/~hsz/sql/
New, upgraded test results. As we
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs RAID1+0 hw.
Now if
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs
2003-08-25 ragyog napjn scott.marlowe ezt zente:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
for other test.
It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
it stacked up against the others.
Shame? I smell here a harcore BSD fighter
2003-08-22 ragyog napjn Robert Treat ezt zente:
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
for other test.
It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
it stacked up against the
Tomka Gergely wrote:
2003-08-22 ragyog napjn Robert Treat ezt zente:
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
for other test.
It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
it stacked up
Tomka,
Did you get my test suggestion? It never hit the lists, so I wonder if you
got it
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 16:54, Tomka Gergely wrote:
2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Robert Treat ezt üzente:
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
for other test.
It's a shame you didn't test
On 22/08/2003 22:00 Bill Moran wrote:
[snip] Well, as much as I _am_ a die-hard BSD geek, I'm far more
interested in
knowing what platform is really best when I need a top-notch PostgreSQL
server.
I'm going to try to force some time this weekend to do some tests ...
we'll see if I succeed ...
2003-08-22 ragyog napjn Josh Berkus ezt zente:
Tomka,
Did you get my test suggestion? It never hit the lists, so I wonder if you
got it
Yes, we got it, and we use your ideas. Thanks.
--
Tomka Gergely
S most - vajon barbrok nlkl mi lesz velnk?
k mgiscsak megolds voltak valahogy...
Tomka Gergely wrote:
http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
the Linux/Postgres systems.
The four test was:
teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans.
teszt3 - 14.000.000 inserts, 1.000 in one
Tomka Gergely wrote:
2003-08-21 ragyog napjn Bill Moran ezt zente:
Tomka Gergely wrote:
http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
the Linux/Postgres systems.
The four test was:
teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
teszt2 -
14 matches
Mail list logo
