> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmm,Andreas's original function seems to contain other statements.
> > If the function contains DML statements for the table Temp_Num_Table,
> > it wouldn't work properly. i.e 1st call would work but
"Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm,Andreas's original function seems to contain other statements.
> If the function contains DML statements for the table Temp_Num_Table,
> it wouldn't work properly. i.e 1st call would work but 2nd call woudn't.
Are you thinking about plpgsql's cach
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane
>
> Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > web=# create function pHelpTable( )
> > web-# returns int
> > web-# As '
> > web'# Begin
> > web'# Create Table Temp_NumTable ( Num int ) ;
> > web'#
> > web'# return 17 ;
> > we
Any light on this subject?
The Hermit Hacker wrote:"use cut-n-paste please, and send us the
results of theEXPLAIN ... stufflike the cost estimates and whatnot tell
us *so* much..."This is it:exis=# \d
pvdprcod NUMART | integer |
not null NUMDEP | smallint | not
null NUMPRO
does anyone have links to independent benchmarks
just mysql vs postgresql would be cool
the last one that came out was from Great Bridge
has been contested by many {including mysql} i was wondering if anyone
here does have independent benchmarks
id sure appreciate
Hi, there,
I don't think that you can use DDL in PL/pgSQL, normally say , you can
only use DML in PL/pgSQL.
i.e. you can use select into,update,delete,insert ... , but you cannot use
create, alter, grant ...
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I striped down my function up to a strange thing:
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > hlefebvre wrote:
> >> I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
> >> do that ?
>
> > You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. The
> > problem is nested deeper and requires the planned
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> web=# create function pHelpTable( )
> web-# returns int
> web-# As '
> web'# Begin
> web'# Create Table Temp_NumTable ( Num int ) ;
> web'#
> web'# return 17 ;
> web'# End; '
> web-# language 'plpgsql' ;
> CREATE
The majori
Hello,
I striped down my function up to a strange thing:
web=# create function pHelpTable( )
web-# returns int
web-# As '
web'# Begin
web'# Create Table Temp_NumTable ( Num int ) ;
web'#
web'# return 17 ;
web'# End; '
web-# language 'plpgsql' ;
CREATE
web=#
web=# s
Sort of nevermind, can I can save it tab delimited, but I am still curious
if it can be done using fixed width fields.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August
Is it possible to copy from a text file that has the fields as fixed width
with no delimiter to a table?
The other option is a CSV file... but then how do I handle if there is a
comma in one of the fields?
I'm transfering information from an AS/400 ... if it is into a text file, it
is fixed widt
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, hlefebvre wrote:
>> create table mytable( CreateDate timestamp default timestamp('now'),
>> );
> I've done a pg_dump and there this line was transformed to:
> "createdat" timestamp DEFAULT '23.08.2000 15:35:16.00 CEST'::"t
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hlefebvre wrote:
>> I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
>> do that ?
> You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. The
> problem is nested deeper and requires the planned querytree
> redesign to
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I tried:
>
> web=# CREATE FUNCTION changed_at_timestamp () RETURNS OPAQUE AS '
> web'# BEGIN
> web'# ChangeDate := timestamp(''now'');
> web'# RETURN NEW;
> web'# END;
> web'# ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
> CREATE
> web=# select changed_at_timestamp () ;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anatoly K. Lasareff) writes:
> I'afraid no. My question is: if I pass one null argument into function
> then all other argumens, which are not null, became null inside
> function body.
Yes --- and not only that, but the function's result will be taken to be
null whether you wan
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, hlefebvre wrote:
> create table mytable( CreateDate timestamp default timestamp('now'),
> );
I've done a pg_dump and there this line was transformed to:
"createdat" timestamp DEFAULT '23.08.2000 15:35:16.00 CEST'::"timestamp",
I'm afraid if I ever should use this
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, hlefebvre wrote:
> create table mytable( CreateDate timestamp default timestamp('now'),
> );
Thanks, this works.
> CREATE FUNCTION myt_stamp () RETURNS OPAQUE AS
> BEGIN
> ChangeDate := timestamp(''now'');
> RETURN NEW;
> END;
> ' LANGUAGE 'pl
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jan Wieck wrote:
> You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. The
> problem is nested deeper and requires the planned querytree
> redesign to get solved.
>
> Before you ask: The mentioned redesign will NOT be done for
> 7.1, and I'm not
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Before you ask: The mentioned redesign will NOT be done for
> 7.1, and I'm not sure if we will be able to do it for 7.2
> yet.
I hope that 7.2 :-), my query/plan cache is still outside current
interest and if core developers not will wo
> "GV" == Graham Vickrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GV> Thanks Anatoly
GV> So if I understand you correctly you can't pass more than one NULL int into
GV> a function?
I'afraid no. My question is: if I pass one null argument into function
then all
other argumens, which are not null, beca
hlefebvre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
> do that ?
You can't. Not with PL/pgSQL nor with any other PL or C. The
problem is nested deeper and requires the planned querytree
redesign to get solved.
Before you ask: T
Thanks Anatoly
So if I understand you correctly you can't pass more than one NULL int into
a function?
Therefore Newbe DBA type question: -
Is this a shortcoming in postgres or is it to be expected when dealing with
transactions?
If it is a shotcoming are there any plans to include it in future
Graham Vickrage wrote:
>
> As far as i know, you can only return single values from functions at the
> moment.
>
> Regards
>
> Graham
Hum, this is possible a least in SQL functions.
But maybe impossible in PL/PGSQL
As far as i know, you can only return single values from functions at the
moment.
Regards
Graham
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of hlefebvre
Sent: 23 August 2000 11:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SQL] Using SETOF in plpgsql function
> "TL" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TL> "Graham Vickrage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> However my understanding was that if the default value is SQL NULL then any
>> values passed into the function that are null would be treated as 'NULL'.
TL> Not sure what you think you mea
Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> could someone enlighten a fairly beginner how to define columns
> of a table with the following features:
>
>CreateDate DEFAULT value should store current date and time
create table mytable( CreateDate timestamp default timestamp('now'),
);
>
Hello,
could someone enlighten a fairly beginner how to define columns
of a table with the following features:
CreateDate DEFAULT value should store current date and time
ChangeDate DEFAULT value at creation as above and a Trigger
function which stores data end time of any ch
Hello,
I'd like to return a set of integer in an pl/pgsql function. How can I
do that ?
I've tried things like that, put I've an error when executing :
CREATE FUNCTION SP_UPLES() RETURNS setof INTEGER AS '
DECLARE ID INTEGER;
BEGIN
select a into id from foo;
return ID ;
END;
Hi!
At 14:16 22.08.00 -0400, you wrote:
>Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I haven't looked at the code, but pg_class only has a boolean
> > telling if a class has rules or not. Could it be that adding
> > more rules (or dropping just a few instead of all) doesn't
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
