Thanks for your reply. Stephan.
On Thursday 18 July 2002 12:01, you wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> > > what if i do not want to fire sperate delete SQLs for the slave
> > >
> > > > tables ?
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> > what is mean is that I a have many tables(x,y,z...) w
> what if i do not want to fire sperate delete SQLs for the slave
>
> > tables ?
Hi ,
what is mean is that I a have many tables(x,y,z...) which reference the
master table (M).
I want that the records from the tables (x,y,z ect) automatically get deleted
in the function when i delete the rec
Just in case there was some misunderstanding of my suggestion here is
what I had in mind.
Your query:
SELECT t1.id, t1.name, t1.abbreviation, t1.juris_id
FROM t1
UNION ALL
SELECT t2.id, t2.name, NULL, t2.juris_id
FROM t2;
My suggestion:
SELECT t3.id, coalesce(t1.name, t2.name), t1.abbreviation,
Bruno,
> I think you might be able to do this using (one sided) outer joins of the
event
> table to the Case and Trial Group tables. The join rules will need to work
for
> exactly one of the two tables. You probably will want to use case statements
in
> the select list to pick values from the
"Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -> Seq Scan on part (cost=0.00..12399.00 rows=1 width=4) (actual
>time=24.88..4076.81 rows=10856 loops=1)
Seems like the major misestimation is above: the LIKE clause on part is
estimated to select just one row, but it selects 10856 o
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 July 2002 21:41, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Rajesh Kumar Mallah. wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > This problem has been troubling me for quite sometime and
> > > I would be very thankful for your help.
> > >
> > > I have
perhaps This is more elegant has Tom has indicated :
select pg_get_indexdef(oid) from pg_class where relname = 'email_bank_email';
pg_get_indexdef
---
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX email_bank_email
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:51:03 +0200
"Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aggregate (cost=1257368.92..1287375.04 rows=600122 width=12) (actual
> time=1236941.71..1454824.56 rows=62 loops=1)
> -> Group (cost=1257368.92..1272371.98 rows=6001225 width=12) (actual
> time=1233
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 15:42:23 -0700,
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Table "events", the largest table in the database, contains event schedule
> listing with 11 attributes and one dependant table as well as recursive
> relationships between events. Each event record can be (a
Thanks that worked, but why does that happen or maybe you could point to the proper
thread so I read up on it.
Alain Lavigne - Data Administrator - ZAQ Interactive Solutions E-Mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
297
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Dirk Lutzebaeck wrote:
Yes.
Select the oid from pg_class where relname is your index name.
Then search in pg_index for column "indisunique" using the previous oid
as "indexrelid".
>
> Hello,
>
> is there a way to ask the system tables if a given index was created
> with t
I have a query and estimations and results don´t
look similar, here is explain analyze:
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Sort (cost=12443.90..12443.90 rows=1
width=93) (actual time=505331.94..505332.67 rows=175 loops=1)
-> Aggregate (cost=12443.88..12443.89 rows=1 width=93) (actual
time=472520.
Hello,
is there a way to ask the system tables if a given index was created
with the unique qualification? I don't want to insert data to try.
Greetings,
Dirk
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.
On Tuesday 16 Jul 2002 11:42 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> OK, I guess I'll have to get into detail:
>
[detail on cases and trial-groups]
>
> Thus, I need to relate (in views and queries) each Event to the Union of
> Cases and Trial Groups. I just can't figure out how to do so without the
> database
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:37:04PM -0500, Kevin Brannen wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Christopher,
> >
> >
> >>In the bad old days when we couldn't distinguish explicit from implicit
> >>cast functions, I was wary of adding new cast pathways. Too many
> >>implicit casts and you have no type s
15 matches
Mail list logo
