Hi ,
No luck . Even with Select Into . Please if
any body has faced similar problem and knows a solution.
CREATE FUNCTION del_old_history() RETURNS int4 AS
'declare var_history_age_limit int4;
set_time datetime;
BEGIN select into
var_history_age_limit history_age_limit from
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:10:53 +0200
Andre Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ride side as follows.
Table d contains information about subitems.
Table c holds information about subitems and items of type bar.
Each subitem can have 0..n items bar selected.
What i want is that a subitem is
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:26, Sugandha Shah wrote:
Hi ,
I'm getting this error :
Error occurred while executing PL/pgSQL function ins_schedule_status
line 42 at SQL statement
parser: parse error at or near $1
Unable to locate the cause. Please any hint or clue will be of great help.
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:29, Sugandha Shah wrote:
Hi ,
No luck . Even with Select Into . Please if any body has faced similar problem and
knows a solution.
CREATE FUNCTION del_old_history() RETURNS int4 AS '
^
declare
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:56:16 +0530
Sugandha Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- check for the exact same status string reported
-- previously and skip it if found
select into last_status top 1 status, last_code status_code from
status_log where schedule_id
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 1:29 pm, Sugandha Shah wrote:
Hi ,
No luck . Even with Select Into . Please if any body has faced similar
problem and knows a solution.
You don't need select into here - the sample below deletes everything older
than one day. You should be able to adapt it to your
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:57:02 +0900
Masaru Sugawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:10:53 +0200
Andre Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ride side as follows.
Table d contains information about subitems.
Table c holds information about subitems and items of type bar.
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
I have a testing program that uses 30 concurrent connections
(max_connections = 32 in my postgresql.conf) and each does 100
insertions to a simple table with index.
It took me
Sugandha Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CREATE FUNCTION del_old_history() RETURNS bool AS '
declare
var_history_age_limit int4;
set_timedatetime;
BEGIN
select into var_history_age_limit history_age_limit from database_info;
IF (var_history_age_limit is not null) THEN
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, philip johnson wrote:
I've a stored procedure I'd like to migrate from MS SqlServer
to Postgresql 7.2.1. How can I do ?
here is the stored procedure
CREATE PROCEDURE ws_doc_tree_new
@parent_node_id int,
@label varchar(50),
@publication varchar(32)
Here, you'll
thanks very much
-Message d'origine-
De : Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : mercredi 14 aout 2002 16:36
A : philip johnson
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [SQL] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, philip johnson wrote:
I've a stored procedure I'd like to migrate
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 3:20 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
What was the limiting factor during the test? Was the CPU maxed, memory,
disk
Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 10:30 am, Andreas Tille wrote:
Any hint to solve this kind of chicken-egg-problem?
Your solution is not safe anyway - you could end up with two processes trying
to insert the next value.
I concur with Richard that Andreas
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:49, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 3:20 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
Yeah, but the problem is,
I would like examples of functions using update, insert and
delete, where LANGUAGE 'SQL', both how to write them and how to
use them.
I've got examples of functions as selects coming out of my ears,
and PL/pgsql examples of more complex needs, but I just need to
run a simple UPDATE. And I
Wei Weng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:49, Richard Huxton wrote:
If it's not CPU, is the system going into swap or are you seeing a
lot of disk activity?
I did hear a lot of disk noise when I ran the test. How do I tell if the
system is going into swap?
Try running
Sue Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like examples of functions using update, insert and
delete, where LANGUAGE 'SQL', both how to write them and how to
use them.
Have you read the documentation?
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/xfunc-sql.html
The first
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 4:29 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
Yeah, but the problem is, say I have 20 users using select on the
database at the same time, and each select takes 10 seconds to finish. I
really can't queue them up (or the last
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:04:21 +0200
Andre Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this mention implies that the tuple of (1, 1) in the c is supposed
^^
b
to take
19 matches
Mail list logo
