Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make install-all-headers
That's not a complete solution though; the headers are only half the
problem. Makefiles are the other half, and our story on them is pretty
bad. For instance I've been meaning to ask what to do about this open
bug report:
Hi,
I was wondering if there has been any further development on running SQL
statements involving more than one database? We are porting a database from
SQLServer to Postgres and some queries in related applications use joins on
tables that are in different databases. We know we can modify the
Heflin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The postgres specific way of doing this is:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (auction.auction_id)
auction.auction_id, image.image_id, image.image_descr
FROM auction JOIN image ON auction.auction_id = image.auction_id
WHERE auction.auction_owner =
hey thanks! it worked:)
here's how we did it:
select sampletime from data where
(extract(seconds from sampletime)::int)::text
in (14, 17, 19);
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denis P Gohel
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Ok. I think I found the problem is related to this Bug.
is there anywhere to check the status of this bug?
regards,
=
Riccardo G. Facchini
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 21:07, Kemin Zhou wrote:
Here I have a very simple case
table1
table1_removed
anotherTable
create or replace RULE rec_remove as ON DELETE TO table1
do insert into table1_remove
select old.*, a.acc from old g join anotherTable a on g.acc=a.other_acc;
===
the
On Thursday 22 April 2004 08:00, Becky Alcorn wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there has been any further development on running SQL
statements involving more than one database? We are porting a database
from SQLServer to Postgres and some queries in related applications use
joins on tables
Hello,
I'd love to be able to do that, but I cannot just ORDER BY uu.add_date,
because I do not have uu.add_date in the SELECT part of the statement.
The reason I don't have it there is because I need distinct MM DD
values back.
Is there a trick that I could use to make this more elegant?
Yes indeed, I seem to have misinterpreted that last one. My apologies.
The distinct solution I mentioned isn't going to solve it, you are absolutely right in
your example.
To get back on track:
You don't have to use a field in the select part of you query to be able to use it in
the order by
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.imp_test_to_out_test(imp_test)
RETURNS imp_test AS
'begin
return $1;
end;'
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' STABLE;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.imp_test_trigger()
RETURNS trigger AS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd love to be able to do that, but I cannot just ORDER BY uu.add_date,
because I do not have uu.add_date in the SELECT part of the statement.
Sure you can. Back around SQL89 there was a restriction that ORDER BY
values had to appear in the SELECT list as well, but
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 01:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Kemin Zhou wrote:
IN chapter 33 Extending SQL
33.7.5 Writing Code
when run pg_config --includedir-server
I got /usr/local/pgsql/include/server but my machine does have this
directory
make install-all-headers
It's explained in
Hello,
Hm, doesn't work for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mydb= select distinct date_part('year', uu.add_date),
date_part('month', uu.add_date), date_part('day',
uu.add_date) from uus inner join ui on uus.user_id=ui.id inner join
uu on ui.id=uu.user_id where uus.subscriber_user_id=1 order by
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 07:59 schrieb Tom Lane:
For instance I've been meaning to ask what to do about this open
bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112244
Well, perhaps getting the tutorial to compile should be
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 01:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
make install-all-headers
It's explained in the installation instructions.
That doesn't happen on most platforms in the standard package.
Depends what you mean by standard package? The PGDG and Red
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 15:58 schrieb Rod Taylor:
make install-all-headers
It's explained in the installation instructions.
That doesn't happen on most platforms in the standard package.
It certainly happens in all the
Our business has multiple cost/profit centers that I call business units,
these are in a table called buinessunits. We also have a table that holds a
list of services that are offerred by a business. Each business unit has
many services it offers; 1 businees unit = Many Services. We want to be
Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 15:58 schrieb Rod Taylor:
make install-all-headers
It's explained in the installation instructions.
That doesn't happen on most platforms in the standard package.
It certainly happens in all the packages that have ever come by me (maybe
after a little
Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 07:59 schrieb Tom Lane:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make install-all-headers
That's not a complete solution though; the headers are only half the
problem. Makefiles are the other half, and our story on them is pretty
bad. For instance I've been
Richard Huxton wrote:
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 21:07, Kemin Zhou wrote:
Here I have a very simple case
table1
table1_removed
anotherTable
create or replace RULE rec_remove as ON DELETE TO table1
do insert into table1_remove
select old.*, a.acc from old g join anotherTable a on
Rod Taylor wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 01:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Kemin Zhou wrote:
IN chapter 33 Extending SQL
33.7.5 Writing Code
when run pg_config --includedir-server
I got /usr/local/pgsql/include/server but my machine does NOT have this
directory
make
Hi,
this is pg 7.4.1
I am opening a connection to postgres
starting a transaction
executing a plpgsql function that creates temp tables
executing a plpgsql function that populates the temp tables
querying the temp table
closing the transaction
then on the same connection, I open a
Bruce Momjian writes:
There is an FAQ item on this --- use EXECUTE.
So I should be using EXECUTE for all access to the temp tables? ie inserts,
and selects (in this case). Should I use execute for the table creation?
Dennis
---(end of
There is an FAQ item on this --- use EXECUTE.
---
Dennis wrote:
Hi,
this is pg 7.4.1
I am opening a connection to postgres
starting a transaction
executing a plpgsql function that creates temp tables
executing
Hi,
i am looking for something like
$ SELECT btrim(replace(' too many spaces! ', '\s+',' '), '');
too many spaces
i searched the function list and tried to combine to or more functions, but i
miss a replace function which uses regular expressions.
Do i have to write my own function or
Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
then on the same connection, I open a transaction, execute a plpgsql
function that populates the temp tables and the function bombs with this
error message:
ERROR: schema pg_temp_8 does not exist
That's a bit hard to believe. Could we see a complete test
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dennis wrote:
So I should be using EXECUTE for all access to the temp tables? ie inserts,
and selects (in this case). Should I use execute for the table creation?
All access from plpgsql functions for temp tables should use EXECUTE,
I think that
Janning Vygen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i searched the function list and tried to combine to or more
functions, but i miss a replace function which uses regular
expressions.
There isn't one in the SQL standard. Most people who need one write a
one-liner function in plperl or pltcl.
(Mind
28 matches
Mail list logo
