--- Jaime Casanova <__> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> Well i rethink my design 'cause the other was too slow. but all
> solutions
> involves new problems... now my problem is with a function of this
> type:
>
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
> "public"."rec_f_consultarplanificacionrubros"
> (smallint, sm
--- Phil Endecott <__> wrote:
> Dear Postgresql experts,
>
> I'm writing a simple plpgsql function that selects a row from a
> table, modifies it slightly, and inserts the modified version. This
> sounds simple, but I can't find how to do the insert in a simple
> generic fashion: although SELECT
hi all,
Well i rethink my design 'cause the other was too slow. but all solutions
involves new problems... now my problem is with a function of this type:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "public"."rec_f_consultarplanificacionrubros"
(smallint, smallint, char(9), smallint, smallint, smallint, char(2))
Just a heads up folks...
In converting from 7.3 to 7.4 one got-ya we had was...
We had been testing 7.4 for a few days and just noticed that some tables had
created_timestamp rows with a date/time of the date the DB was created...not
the date/time the insert was done.
Looking at those tables the
So, I think that PreparedStatement should have a way at least case a
String to an Array or a way to create a Array, because of
conn.prepareStatement("SELECT myfunction('{1,2,3}')") is NOT very
useful.
Comment?
Jie Liang
-Original Message-
From: Kris Jurka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
Nope, I think you are right. The improvement of performance will be
minimal. Because that to parse "SELECT * FROM myfunction(?,?,?)" is very
very quick.
However, I am still thinking if I call one SELECT and one DELECT and one
UPDATE and one INSERT a thousand times against same table with different