I have been looking around to get an idea how to make RULES on a VIEW
for INSERT , UPDATE and DELETE of a VIEW with an INNER JOIN.
First the idea:
There are 3 tables, those are related one way or another, combined in
this view:
pg_user (ok, it's a view really)
tblcontacts (with contact informa
Thanks for the reply at least that explains it.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Richard Huxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 June 2005 12:22
To: Nick Stone
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Query question
Nick Stone wrote:
> Hi
>
> Whilst I'm not new to SQL I am r
M.D.G. Lange wrote:
Another option would be:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=2003 OR id=1342 OR id=799 OR id=1450;
This should give you the results in the right order...
Per the SQL Standard, the rows of a table have no ordering. The result
of a SELECT is just a derived table. Assuming a row
Nick Stone wrote:
Hi
Whilst I'm not new to SQL I am reasonably new to Postgres and as such I have
a question on the following query:
FROM
"Terms" As tbl1 LEFT JOIN
"SearchStore" As tbl2 ON tbl1."KeywordID" = tbl2."KeywordID" AND
tbl2."StockID" = 1
Why does the above query work fine an
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 11:27 schrieb Nick Stone:
> SELECT
> tbl1."TermTypeID",
> tbl1."ParentID",
> tbl1."KeywordID",
> tbl1."Term",
> tbl2."KeywordID"
> FROM
> "Terms" As tbl1 LEFT JOIN
> "SearchStore" As tbl2 ON tbl1."KeywordID" = tbl2."KeywordID"
> WHERE
> (
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2005 00:55 schrieb Tom Lane:
> It's not that hard to make your own type using the builtin textin and
> textout functions, and then add just the functions you wish to provide.
Implementing the "distinct type" feature of SQL would probably amount to
something like that. Mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> fair enough. but a simple order by id would never work.
That was me, sorry, I must have been asleep when I wrote it. :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200506300636
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E944
Hi
Whilst I'm not new to SQL I am reasonably new to Postgres and as such I have
a question on the following query:
SELECT
tbl1."TermTypeID",
tbl1."ParentID",
tbl1."KeywordID",
tbl1."Term",
tbl2."KeywordID"
FROM
"Terms" As tbl1 LEFT JOIN
"SearchStore" As tbl2 ON tbl1."K
|> > I disagree. In several relations (views of the world) one
|needs to have a
|> > hand full of well defined values while
|> > integers or bools are not appropriate and strings are too
|free form.
|> > For example male female or true and false. Whilst the
|second has a well
|> > known type, ot
On 6/30/05, M.D.G. Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another option would be:
> SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=2003 OR id=1342 OR id=799 OR id=1450;
> This should give you the results in the right order...
I don't think so...
create temporary table seq as select * from generate_series(1,20) as g(
Another option would be:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE id=2003 OR id=1342 OR id=799 OR id=1450;
This should give you the results in the right order...
- Michiel
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:22, Russell Simpkins wrote:
fair enough. but a simple order by id would never work.
11 matches
Mail list logo