Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Eugene E. wrote:
the problem is: you'll get this four byte sequence '\000' _instead_
of NUL-byte anyway.
What you seem to be missing is t
Yes! Thanks you very much!
--- Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:58:26PM -0700, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> > I am look for help in developing a query that will return the nearest
> > process record that was logged at or after each hour in a day (i.e.
> > hour
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:58:26PM -0700, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
> I am look for help in developing a query that will return the nearest
> process record that was logged at or after each hour in a day (i.e.
> hourly snapshot).
Are you looking for something like this?
SELECT p.process, date_tr
I orginally sent this email to the [novice] list but did not get any response.
I am look for help in developing a query that will return the nearest process
record that was
logged at or after each hour in a day (i.e. hourly snapshot).
Below are typical sample data. Also, I've included a
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>
> >>>Eugene E. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> the problem is: you'll get this four byte sequence '\000' _instead_
> of NUL-byte anyway.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Wha
On Apr 4, 2006, at 19:30 , Eugene E. wrote:
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
No, that is still using the textual form. If you use PQexecParams
and set
the last argument to show you want binary data, you should get binary
data.
Documenta
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Eugene E. wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Eugene E. wrote:
the problem is: you'll get this four byte sequence '\000' _instead_
of NUL-byte anyway.
What you seem to be missing is that PostgreSQL data can be represented
in textual and in binary fo
