Re: [SQL] Help with privilages please

2006-07-20 Thread Tom Lane
Hilary Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have an existing table suppliers and I have created a new user > 'hilary' > REVOKE ALL on TABLE suppliers FROM hilary; > now login as hilary > SELECT * from suppliers; > and I get all the records!!! Most likely there's been a grant of (at least) select

Re: [SQL] simple problem???

2006-07-20 Thread Richard Broersma Jr
> A|B|C > 1|2|20 > 1|3|10 > 1|4|21 > 2|3|12 > 2|4|22 > 3|4|23 > 1|3|10 > 2|3|12 > 3|4|23 > -select all records where A=1, > -find, into this selection, the record where there's the minimum value > of the field C > -print all the fields for this record. maybe this will work; select a,b,c from ta

Re: [SQL] Error when trying to use a FOR loop

2006-07-20 Thread George Weaver
- Original Message From: "Kevin Nikiforuk" xp512-0715-0716=# FOR LV in 1..10 LOOP It appears that you are trying to use the For .. Loop structure from the psql command line. This structure is not plain SQL - its meant to be used within PL/pgSQL. Have you tried incorporating it int

Re: [SQL] Help with privilages please

2006-07-20 Thread Richard Broersma Jr
REVOKE ALL on TABLE suppliers FROM hilary; now login as hilary SELECT * from suppliers; and I get all the records!!! If I create a **new** table though and then do the above, the permissionswork I get a polite message telling me "no go". Thissounds to me like a problem with earlier compatibility

Re: [SQL] Error when trying to use a FOR loop

2006-07-20 Thread Richard Broersma Jr
> Sorry if this is in the archives, but I've done a search and couldn't find > anything relevant. > I'm running HP's precompiled version of 8.1.3.1 as part of their Internet > Express offering, and > I can't seem to run a for loop. Here's what I'm seeing: > xp512-0715-0716=# FOR LV in 1..10 LOOP

Re: [SQL] Error when trying to use a FOR loop

2006-07-20 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Kevin Nikiforuk wrote: > Sorry if this is in the archives, but I've done a search and couldn't > find anything relevant. I'm running HP's precompiled version of 8.1.3.1 > as part of their Internet Express offering, and I can't seem to run a > for loop. Here's what I'm seeing:

Re: [SQL] Help with privilages please

2006-07-20 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Hilary Forbes wrote: > Dear All > > We are running pg v 7.4.1 and importantly the database has been > converted from earlier versions of pg (6.5 I seem to recall). > > I have an existing table suppliers and I have created a new user 'hilary' > > REVOKE ALL on TABLE suppliers F

[SQL] Help with privilages please

2006-07-20 Thread Hilary Forbes
Dear All We are running pg v 7.4.1 and importantly the database has been converted from earlier versions of pg (6.5 I seem to recall). I have an existing table suppliers and I have created a new user 'hilary' REVOKE ALL on TABLE suppliers FROM hilary; now login as hilary SELECT * from suppliers; a

[SQL] simple problem???

2006-07-20 Thread ivan marchesini
Dear users It's a simple problem I think (and I hope :-) I have a table like this: A|B|C 1|2|20 1|3|10 1|4|21 2|3|12 2|4|22 3|4|23 where the first two column are a combination without repetition (with k=2) of the numbers 1,2,3,4 for each pair I have a value in the column C. I would want a s

[SQL] Error when trying to use a FOR loop

2006-07-20 Thread Kevin Nikiforuk
Sorry if this is in the archives, but I've done a search and couldn't find anything relevant. I'm running HP's precompiled version of 8.1.3.1 as part of their Internet Express offering, and I can't seem to run a for loop. Here's what I'm seeing: xp512-0715-0716=# FOR LV in 1..10 LOOP xp512-071

Re: [SQL] Storing encrypted data?

2006-07-20 Thread John Tregea
Hi Aaron, I removed them because when I bring the data back into my GUI, the returns are treated as a record break by the software and I cannot decrypt them or display the rest of the record that is not encrypted. Regards John T Aaron Bono wrote: On 7/19/06, *John Tregea* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SQL] INSERT/UPDATEs cycles and lack of phantom locking

2006-07-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > In addition, it occurred to me that I get the INSERT failure only if > there is a suitable PRIMARY KEY/UNIQUE constraint on the table. I > haven't got that in all cases, so I need that advisory locking anyway, It seems that LOCK TABLE ... IN EXCLUSIVE MODE does exactly what I