On Monday 25 February 2008 8:07 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, your email client puts Dean's email address back in? Might I ask
> > > what option you chose? And if you have more than one? On gmail
> > > there's th
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, your email client puts Dean's email address back in? Might I ask
> > what option you chose? And if you have more than one? On gmail
> > there's the reply link only.
> >
> I hit Reply All which sends to the lis
On Monday 25 February 2008 7:32 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> > > I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> > > messages.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:26:50 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.s. I've been using the internet since the mid 80s, and programming
> since the late 70s too. I remember a spam free internet, a spam free
> usenet even. Wish it could come back, but know that it won't.
Damn that Ca
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bou
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> > I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> > messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bounces if this
> >
had to dig it outta the trash. Hit reply (there was no reply all) and
it looks like it's going to the right place, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
(someone who hates top posting in technical discussions, but admits
there's time, like these, when it makes perfect sense... :)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:13
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> >> I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> >> messages. If a couple people (
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dean K. Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are missing the point of why I do this. If it weren't for spammers
No, I'm not. You're tilting at windmills. If you post to a public
list, you will get spammed on that email address and there's not a lot
you can
Adrian Klaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
>> I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
>> messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bounces if this
>> doesn't work) would just "Reply" and/o
On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bounces if this
> doesn't work) would just "Reply" and/or "Reply All" to this message, I'd
> appreciate
On Monday 25 February 2008 7:13 pm, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
> I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
> messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bounces if this
> doesn't work) would just "Reply" and/or "Reply All" to this message, I'd
> appreciate
I have changed something in my eMail client regarding receiving
messages. If a couple people (who don't mind getting bounces if this
doesn't work) would just "Reply" and/or "Reply All" to this message, I'd
appreciate it.
Sincerely, Dean
--
Mail to my list address should normally be sent via
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2008-02-22 21:34, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >
> > Bouncing messages from a public list is kinda rude.
> >
> > No mor
Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
On 2008-02-22 21:34, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Bouncing messages from a public list is kinda rude.
No more so, than sending two copies of your reply to me, because you
don't go up to your mailer's "To:" line and manually delete the extra
address (as I do on
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2008-02-22 21:34, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>
> Bouncing messages from a public list is kinda rude.
>
> No more so, than sending two copies of your reply to me, because you don't
> go up to your mailer
On 2008-02-22 21:34, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Bouncing messages from a public list is kinda rude.
No more so, than sending two copies of your reply to me, because you
don't go up to your mailer's "To:" line and manually delete the extra
address (as I do on EVERY reply I send to this list).
In
In the documentation "IS NOT DISTINCT FROM" only appears in version 8.2
The 8.0 and 8.1 documentation only mentions "IS DISTINCT FROM".
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/functions-comparisons.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/functions-comparisons.html
http://www.postgresql.o
18 matches
Mail list logo
