Re: [SQL] Select default values

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Giorgio Valoti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Um - there is no default value for a function. > > Without this "feature" you have to overload > the function arguments. You could pass a casted null to the function. The would eliminate function overloading. Then in

Re: [SQL] Select default values

On 24/lug/08, at 12:42, Richard Huxton wrote: Giorgio Valoti wrote: postgres=# insert into f(a,b) values(default, default) returning *; It seems that you can’t use the same syntax with function calls: select function(default,default); gives a syntax error. Is it expected? Um - there is no d

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

n Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:53 AM, A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 9:47:48 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: >> I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? >> http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs-truncate-statement.html > > Not r

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

A. Kretschmer wrote: am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 9:47:48 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs-truncate-statement.html Not realy, for instance, pg can rollback a truncate, and a seque

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 10:01:46 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: > A. Kretschmer wrote: > >am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 9:47:48 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: > >>I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? > >>http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs-truncate-sta

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs-truncate-statement.html Emi Lu wrote: Good morning, If I remember correctly, "delete" does not release space, while truncate will. I have an option now (1) Use object cre

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

The truncate is more fast to delete, the truncate command not scan the table http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-truncate.html --- On Thu, 7/24/08, A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: A. Kretschmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete > To: pgsql-s

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 9:47:48 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: > I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? > http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs-truncate-statement.html Not realy, for instance, pg can rollback a truncate, and a sequence are not reset.

[SQL] truncate vs. delete

Good morning, If I remember correctly, "delete" does not release space, while truncate will. I have an option now (1) Use object creator(with create/drop permission which I do not need in my cronjob script) to truncate table1(>100,000 recs) records (2) Use user1(has r/w only) to delete fro

Re: [SQL] postgres time zone settings

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Anoop G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hai all, > > when i was going through the Postgresql documents, i came across a section > which tells about the TIME ZONE settings > > > what i understood from the document is, based on the value given in this > conf file postgre

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

A. Kretschmer wrote: am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 10:01:46 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: A. Kretschmer wrote: am Thu, dem 24.07.2008, um 9:47:48 -0400 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: I found a link for SQL Server, it applies to PostgreSQL 8.0.x as well? http://vadivel.blogspot.com/2004/06/delete-vs

Re: [SQL] truncate vs. delete

Emi Lu wrote: Thank you. I am quite sure that I will not use "delete" now. Now I a question about how efficient between (1) truncate a big table (with 200, 000) vacuum it (optional?) drop primary key load new data load primary key vacuum it (2) drop table (this table has no

[SQL] postgres time zone settings

Hai all, when i was going through the Postgresql documents, i came across a section which tells about the TIME ZONE settings what i understood from the document is, based on the value given in this conf file postgres will add or subtract the displacement hours to the system time assuming that th

Re: [SQL] Select default values

Giorgio Valoti wrote: postgres=# insert into f(a,b) values(default, default) returning *; It seems that you can’t use the same syntax with function calls: select function(default,default); gives a syntax error. Is it expected? Um - there is no default value for a function. -- Richard Hux

Re: [SQL] Select default values

On 23/lug/08, at 11:28, Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello 2008/7/23 Maximilian Tyrtania <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi there, just a quickie: Is there a way to select all default values of a given table? Something like "Select Default values from sometable" ? Unfortunately this syntax doesn't seem to be

[SQL] Cloning hierarchical data

Hi, let's assume i have a self referencing hierarchical table like this one: CREATE TABLE test (name text,id serial primary key,parent_id integer references test) insert into test (name,id,parent_id) values ('root1',1,NULL),('root2',2,NULL),('root1sub1',3,1),('root1sub2',4,1),('root 2sub1',5,2),