s they start on Monday. In Portuguese, the word for Monday
can also be translated as "Second", as in "Second day". How to say that the
second day is in fact the first? :-)
--
Jorge Godoy
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 18:31, Hiltibidal, Rob <
rob.hiltibi...@argushealth.com>
re is no week 00). 28 December is always in the
last week of its year.
The week number can be described by counting the Thursdays: week 12 contains
the 12th Thursday of the year.
In 2009, January 1st. happened on a Thursday.
As Jan 1st, 2010 happened on a Friday, it was on week 53 of 2009.
--
| The Programs Needed to Create
and Run a PostgreSQL Server | package
| python-storm-postgresql| PostgreSQL backend for
python-storm | package
And no, uuid-ossp isn't there.
--
Jorge Godoy
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 20:29
ust an example code, I haven't tried it myself. I know it works for
plpgsql functions, not sure for sql functions).
Regards,
--
Jorge Godoy
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 08:08, Andreas wrote:
> Hi,
> wouldn't it be great to have functions return "setof something" as r
| end_date
----+----+
1 | 2009-01-01 | 2009-08-31
(1 row)
test=#
--
Jorge Godoy
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 00:59, ramasubramanian <
ramasubramania...@renaissance-it.com> wrote:
> Dear Bor,
> How you will 1 record for 2009/05 (if you use 2009/05 ) it will fet
r can do that. Slower than denormalizing the database, but it
can be done.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
l-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> I think it is just a metter of rpm -qa postgresql-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> but I do not have the adm permissions.
You don't need them to query or list the contents of uninstalled packages.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
n 90 and 2). Can anyone please help?
>
I believe this isn't hard if you use a statistical function. You can have one
fairly quickly with PL/R.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
were looked at was bigger than 0.6 then he can use that rand() trick.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
gresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-set-session-authorization.html
Also just for completeness: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16650/info
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you chec
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:01:03AM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
>> I can think that spreading processing requirements should be one. And
>> distributing load another one. Disk space can be solved with new disks and
>> ta
stributing load another one. Disk space can be solved with new disks and
tablespaces, but we can't yet distribute the load through several servers
without partitioning.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
r(MyColumn)); -- invalid syntax
>
> The idea is to have an index on that column, in a not case sensitive form,
> i.e. lower(MyColumn).
What's the problem with CREATE INDEX then?
CREATE INDEX idx_something ON mytable (lower(mycolumn));
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
his has implications on permissions as well, so there will be a
large number of groups -- probably at least one per schema + some common
groups -- and roles as well...
Is this a good idea? Would this be too bad, performance-wise, if I had
thousands of schemas to use like that? Any advice on
Having a procedural approach is not always the
best algorithm, but, as I said, it solves almost all problems.
Thanks,
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Em Sábado 06 Maio 2006 17:05, Ben K. escreveu:
> Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > numbers. Is there any way to select a value from this column and return
> > it as an integer?
>
> My twopence. I just happened to have the same problem with iReports for a
> 10
:integer;
int4
--
123
(1 registro)
testing=#
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
ter
refactoring with nested functions.
If it is not possible, are there any plans to allow this kind of thing?
(Even with a different syntax it would be good to have it.)
TIA,
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
18 matches
Mail list logo