parameter or something else entirely?
BTW the concatenation function you suggest works nicely except that as you
noted, it concatenates in an unpredictable order, so I'm now trying to solve
that problem.
-Nick
--
Nick Fankh
Excellent! Thanks for providing both the idea and an example. I didn't get the
idea right away, but the example made it clear. I'll try that on my table and
report back on how it works out.
Regards,
-Nick
--
Nick
#x27;m not seeing.
Thanks
-Nick
--
--
Nick Fankhauser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 765.935.4283 Fax 765.962.9788
Ray Ontko & Co. - Software Consulting Services
http://www.ontko.com
-
Hi Eric-
Thanks for your suggestion.
> An explain analyze would help.
I'll do that (and move the question to the performance list) when I get to
the performance question, but at this point, I'm just seeking some help in
looking at this from a different angle- I couldn't figure out how to achieve
,
case_count desc,
limit
1000;
Thanks!
-Nick
-----
Nick Fankhauser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 1.765.965.7363 Fax 1.765.962.9788
doxpop - Court records at your fingertips - http://www.doxpop.com/
---(end of broadcast)-
,
case_count desc,
limit
1000;
Thanks!
-Nick
-----
Nick Fankhauser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 1.765.965.7363 Fax 1.765.962.9788
doxpop - Court records at your fingertips - http://www.doxpop.com/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
1) then pid end from pfm where fid in
(1,2,3) group by pid order by count(pid) desc;
-Nick
------
Nick Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone 1.765.935.4283 Fax 1.765.962.9788
Ray Ontko & Co. Software Consulting Services
