Re: [SQL] Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again

2009-07-27 Thread Science
Craig Ringer wrote: On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 19:15 -0400, Science wrote: FWIW, the way the Rails ORM ActiveRecord (another fairly damaged ORM) handles this is by allowing you to open any number of transaction blocks, but only the outer transaction block commits (in Pg): Property.transaction

Re: [SQL] Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again

2009-07-26 Thread Science
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:06:50 +0100 From: Richard Huxton To: Glenn Maynard Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bit by "commands ignored until end of transaction block" again Message-ID: <4a681a1a.1090...@archonet.com> Glenn Maynard wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Richar

Re: [SQL] [pgsql-sql] Daily digest v1.3050 (5 messages)

2009-06-26 Thread Science
pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org wrote: Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:13:42 +0100 From: "Oliveiros Cristina" To: "Rob Sargent" , Subject: Re: Bucketing Row Data in columns Message-ID: <02e701c9f5af$e8cb4f90$ec5a3...@marktestcr.marktest.pt> I admit that must be a more elegant and faster solut