or users --
think of it.
So i advise to avoid reverting sequences ANYWAY.
Even if you think that this would not cause a problem.
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Jyoti Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Feb 6, 2008 11:51 AM
> > Subject: [SQL]
Thanks. I am not using sequences. I tried an example and it worked.
From: Robins Tharakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Jyoti Seth
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Multiple postgresql functions in a single transaction
It can be
ECTED]>
> Date: Feb 6, 2008 11:51 AM
> Subject: [SQL] Multiple postgresql functions in a single transaction
> To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two postgresql functions. One function is calling another function
> for certain value. I want that these tw
Hi,
I have two postgresql functions. One function is calling another function
for certain value. I want that these two functions work under single
transaction so that even if the value gets generated in the second function
and the first function that calls the second function fails. Then the value
