On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Yasir Malik wrote:
> For my object-relational database class I decided to use PostgreSQL
> because it is my favorite database and it calls it self a ORDBMS. Little
> did I know that it supports supports very little OR features. For
> example, using "create type as" is totall
To: Yasir Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: PostgreSQL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SQL] Object-relational features
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:30 PM, Yasir Malik wrote:
>
> > For
> > example, using "create type as" is totally worthless because you ca
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:30 PM, Yasir Malik wrote:
For
example, using "create type as" is totally worthless because you can't
use
it as a field type in a table; you can't compose in another "create
type
as"; and you can't inherit another composite type. The only way to
create
a true type is to u
Hello,
For my object-relational database class I decided to use PostgreSQL
because it is my favorite database and it calls it self a ORDBMS. Little
did I know that it supports supports very little OR features. For
example, using "create type as" is totally worthless because you can't use
it as a
