[SQL] SQL99 "with recursive" question

2004-09-10 Thread Thomas Wegner
Hello, i think i am to stupid to use the "with recursive" SQL! I have a table: create table tree ( id_tree integer, parent_id integer ... ); In PostgreSQL i use the great connectby() function and in Oracle i simple use select * from tree start with id_tree = 0 connect by parent_id=prior id_

Re: [SQL] SQL99/SQL92 Grammar

2003-02-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
See the developers FAQ for URL's. --- Les Hazlewood wrote: > > Does anyone have a definitive BNF grammar of SQL99 or SQL92? (I'd prefer 99 > but I'll take what I can get ;) > > I'm trying to make a simplified XML to SQL

[SQL] SQL99/SQL92 Grammar

2003-02-03 Thread Les Hazlewood
Does anyone have a definitive BNF grammar of SQL99 or SQL92? (I'd prefer 99 but I'll take what I can get ;) I'm trying to make a simplified XML to SQL translator, and I need the grammar to do so (not Postgres's grammar...the standard grammar). It must be available somewhere, because Postgre

[SQL] SQL99

2002-12-02 Thread Evgen Potemkin
Hi there! Can anybody explain behavior of ? Or give a link where explanation can be found? Or something like that ?:) To my regret, i can't figure it out right from SQL standard description with my "brute force". regards, --- .evgen ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [SQL] sql99 / sql3

2001-01-03 Thread Tom Lane
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What organization is currently responsible for drafting SQL standards? ISO. > How can I obtain publications describing those standards? Is there > anything comprehensive and definitive online? In the US you can buy ISO standards from ANSI, see http:/

[SQL] sql99 / sql3

2001-01-02 Thread Ron Peterson
I just recieved SQL in a Nutshell from O'Reilly. I bought the book because it covers the SQL99 standard. It's my understanding that this is the most recent SQL standard. Am I correct about this? What is the current status of SQL standards? What is the most recent approved standard, and what a