On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
I have a testing program that uses 30 concurrent connections
(max_connections = 32 in my postgresql.conf) and each does 100
insertions to a simple table with index.
It took me
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 3:20 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
What was the limiting factor during the test? Was the CPU maxed, memory,
disk
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:49, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 3:20 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 05:18, Richard Huxton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Aug 2002 9:39 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
Yeah, but the problem is,
Wei Weng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 10:49, Richard Huxton wrote:
If it's not CPU, is the system going into swap or are you seeing a
lot of disk activity?
I did hear a lot of disk noise when I ran the test. How do I tell if the
system is going into swap?
Try running
On Wednesday 14 Aug 2002 4:29 pm, Wei Weng wrote:
[30 connections is much slower than 1 connection 30 times]
Yeah, but the problem is, say I have 20 users using select on the
database at the same time, and each select takes 10 seconds to finish. I
really can't queue them up (or the last