Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Scott writes:
>> but, as i understand the sql92 standard, both att = null and att != null
>> are NOT sql92.
> They are. We just don't implement att = null right because of reasons
> that can be found in the archives.
In a very narrow sense, th
John Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> select count(*) from A where b = null; /* Returns 1, ok */
> select count(*) from A where b != null; /* Returns 0 ... not ok! */
Uh ... there have been several threads about this just in the past
couple days. See for example
http://www.ca.postgre
