Re: [SQL] tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request

2002-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yep! ltree is Fst , and i use it at the moment. > > But will it work in INGRES,DB2 or ORACLE ? > what if tommorow my boss ask me to use ORACLE? > > I have similar issues in using intarray & arrays in PGSQL > > though reasons of shifting to others dbs are dimin

Re: [SQL] tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request

2002-09-03 Thread mallah
Yep! ltree is Fst , and i use it at the moment. But will it work in INGRES,DB2 or ORACLE ? what if tommorow my boss ask me to use ORACLE? I have similar issues in using intarray & arrays in PGSQL though reasons of shifting to others dbs are diminishing with every major release of PG ;-)

Re: [SQL] tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request of comment from joe celko)

2002-09-03 Thread Josh Berkus
Hubert, > i recently spent some time on tree-structures in sql. > i started with simple id/parent_id approach, used by nearly everyone, > then i stopped at joe celko's nested sets, but i found it not very > usable. I'll be posting an article on implementing nested set trees "real soon now". My

Re: [SQL] tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request

2002-09-03 Thread Oleg Bartunov
While I don't have a time to comment your message I want to point to contrib/ltree package which is extremely fast :-) http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/ltree Oleg On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Hubert depesz Lubaczewski wrote: > hi > i recently spent some time on tree-structures in sql.

[SQL] tree structures in sql - my point of view (with request of comment from joe celko)

2002-09-03 Thread Hubert depesz Lubaczewski
hi i recently spent some time on tree-structures in sql. i started with simple id/parent_id approach, used by nearly everyone, then i stopped at joe celko's nested sets, but i found it not very usable. then i found my own (maybe someone wrote it before, but i haven't read it, so idea is mine) way.