Robins Tharakan wrote:
> > It can be done, but it depends on how you are generating the value in the
> > first function.
> > If you sequences though you may have to take care of reverting it
> > yourself.
Sequences had been constructed in this manner not to cause pain for users --
think of it.
S
Thanks. I am not using sequences. I tried an example and it worked.
From: Robins Tharakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Jyoti Seth
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Multiple postgresql functions in a single transaction
It can be
> It can be done, but it depends on how you are generating the value in the
> first function.
> If you sequences though you may have to take care of reverting it
> yourself.
>
> *Robins*
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jyoti Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Feb 6, 2008 11:51 A
