Hi All:
I would like to
put some message in my C function ( myTestFunction).
Currently, I want to see time for each function call inside myTestFunction.
The output to the screen commands are in myTestFunction.
myTestFunction is called
from postgresql. How can I see the messages? Thanks
Hello
I installed PostgreSQL 8.0 on Windows and I can connect from localhost only. How can I configure the server to allow connection from other machines?
Thank you
Catalin
Catalin Pitis wrote:
Hello
I installed PostgreSQL 8.0 on Windows and I can connect from localhost
only. How can I configure the server to allow connection from other
machines?
Thank you
Catalin
Under
Start-> Programs->PostgreSQLXX->Configuration files
postgresql.conf
pg_hba.conf
Are the
No response from the pgsql-admin list so I though I would try cross
posting here:
pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
pgsql-general@postgresql.org
I just know I am not the first to try and do this
Jim
*
Can anyone point me in a direction that may help me populate in real
time a table
Current_user
Timestamp
"The Select Statement Submitted by the User"
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/plpgsql-trigger.html#PLPGSQL-TRIGGER-AUDIT-EXAMPLE
might be close to what you want.
Regards,
Ben K.
Developer
http://benix.tamu.edu
---(end of broadcast)
Hi,
Does beginning a transaction put locks on the tables
queried within the transaction?
In the example below, is #2 necessary? My thought was
that I would need to use an explicit lock to make sure
that the sequence value I'm selecting in #4 is the
same one that is generated from #3. I'm worried
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:10:56AM -0700, Ash Grove wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does beginning a transaction put locks on the tables
> queried within the transaction?
You mean like a table lock? No. A transaction does entail some
locks: for instance, an access exclusive lock will block behind your
share l
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Ash Grove wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does beginning a transaction put locks on the tables
> queried within the transaction?
>
> In the example below, is #2 necessary? My thought was
> that I would need to use an explicit lock to make sure
> that the sequence value I'm selecting in #4 is
On fim, 2006-05-04 at 11:10 -0700, Ash Grove wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does beginning a transaction put locks on the tables
> queried within the transaction?
>
> In the example below, is #2 necessary? My thought was
> that I would need to use an explicit lock to make sure
> that the sequence value I'm sel
After I've changed the pg_hba.conf, I got the following error when connecting (from log file)
2006-05-04 21:57:26 LOG: invalid entry in file "C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/8.0/data/pg_hba.conf" at line 68, token "192.168.0.1/192"2006-05-04 21:57:26 FATAL: missing or erroneous pg_hba.conf file
200
Ok, I found it, it was my mistake.
An IP entry should be have /32 or /128. I used different values. Now I got it (RTFM).
Regards,
Catalin
On 5/4/06, Oisin Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Catalin Pitis wrote:> I did all you said:>> I set pg_hba.conf:>> # IPv4 local connections:
> hostall
11 matches
Mail list logo