This does not exist in SQL. However you could achieve similar
functionality by doing a suitable query against the system info tables
to find out what columns are available and then building your query
appropriately.
For an example, try
psql -E -c '\d mytable'
Drew
Pit M. wrote:
> select *,!Blob
Hello,
I wrote a simple function who checks in a table an address and returns
the id and coordinates of the corresponding address.
The problem is when I run separately the SQL query, it gives me zero (0)
entry when I submit a new address - it is what I want as result - and
when I run my func
Sylvain Racine wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a simple function who checks in a table an address and returns
the id and coordinates of the corresponding address.
The problem is when I run separately the SQL query, it gives me zero (0)
entry when I submit a new address - it is what I want as result -
Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 09:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmm ... the way I would have expected to work is
> >>
> >> alter table posts
> >> alter column deleted drop default,
> >> alter column deleted type char(1)
> >> using (case when dele
I'm having memory problems. I needed to materialize a couple views
(create table t as select * from v) to get acceptable performance from a
small data storage system I'm building, but now I get out of memory
issues on that statement. It is near the bottom of about a 40 line
function, and it com
jason nordwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ERROR: out of memory
> DETAIL: Failed on request of size 856.
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "create table gwt as select * from gworktick"
> PL/pgSQL function "processadd" line 30 at SQL statement
What PG version? What does "explain select * from gworktic
"Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alternatively, you already have the USING clause to tell you how to
> alter the data. How about using it to alter the default as well?
The reasons not to do that are already set forth in the ALTER TABLE
man page.
regards, tom
