trying to do something like
select d.day,
c.name
from [dates between day1 and day2] d
left join c.some_table;
but cannot figure out what to put into the brackets.
Finding fabulous fare
chester c young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> trying to do something like
>
> select d.day,
>c.name
> from [dates between day1 and day2] d
> left join c.some_table;
>
> but cannot figure out what to put into the brackets.
Perhaps something like this:
test=# select curre
Hi list,
Could someone tell me what libs are packed in the rpm
below ?
postgresql-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
We are concerned about the problem of compatibility with
Oracle and we prefer to check all the libs to not put the
Oracle system down.
I think it is just a metter of rpm -qa
postgre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could someone tell me what libs are packed in the rpm below ?
> postgresql-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
If it is somewhere accessible through HTTP:
rpm -qpl http://url-to-it/postgresql-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
If it is local:
rpm -qpl postgresql-libs-8.2.3-1PGDG.i68
Hello, and thank you to Steven and everyone else that submitted input
on this issue.
After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have to develop for.
I set the primary key of
Greg Toombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
> simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
> PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have to develop for.
Egad. *Please* do not tell us you are intending to use 7.1 for prod
What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Toombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
After reading a few more methods of doing things, I went with the
simplest one, as 1. time is of the essence, and 2. I'm stuck with
PostgreSQL 7.1 on the server I have t
Greg Toombs wrote:
> What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
Yes. There are known, unfixed bugs, and architectural problems that
cannot be fixed.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
Hoookay. I'm currently negotiating with IX Webhosting to upgrade
their prehistoric software. Fellows, consider this a word of warning
that, if they don't upgrade, anyone wanting to use this host will be
stuck with PostgreSQL 7.1.3. If they do upgrade, I'll happily revoke
this warning. Anyway, t
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Toombs wrote:
>> What disaster do you foresee? Is that version unstable?
> Yes. There are known, unfixed bugs, and architectural problems that
> cannot be fixed.
We abandoned maintenance of the 7.1 branch in 2001. 7.2 was the first
version that
10 matches
Mail list logo
