Hi
I wonder if anyone can help me with a SELECT / GROUP BY problem I'm having.
I'm trying to refine a query so that my GROUP BY clause only aggregates rows
that have a non-NULL value in one of the fields, leaving other rows
'ungrouped'.
An example table, resulting from a LEFT JOIN and subselect o
Hello,
I'm looking - without luck so far - for a PGSQL function for converting
numbers between two arbitrary bases (typically base 10,16 and 26 in my
case). Something similar to the C 'strtol' function or, ideally, PHP's
baseconvert(string,frombase,tobase) function.
I've search the docs, lists a
getting anywhere!
I have sample data defs to play with if that would be helpful.
Thanks in advance!
Simon Kinsella
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
hould remove the row
completely. (Does not work OK)
--------
Thanks all,
Simon Kinsella
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
cular cascading contraint and replace it with a trigger function that
calls my custom delete function. Not sure if I like that though ;)
Thanks for your feedback,
Simon Kinsella
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:31 PM
To:
a row prior to a
potentially aborted deletion?
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:30:23PM -, Simon Kinsella wrote:
> I'm trying to achieve this with a BEFORE DELETE trigger, which would
> set the 'marked_for_deletion' field to TRUE before attempting the delete
proper.
> Then
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:20 PM
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Help with trigger that updates a row prior to a
potentially aborted deletion?
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:41:20PM -, Simon Kinsella wrote:
> Ok thanks, will check this out. Is that the same as savepoint
n-key
violation resulting from an unmolested DELETE action even for a user who has
not been soft-deleted. If as a test I change the UPDATE action so that it
does something other than change the timestamp then the rule is applied.
This seems pretty weird - can it be true?
---
Simon
s, or some other technique? I'm
relunctant to use SET CONSTRAINTS' 'ALL' clause in case it messes with other
constraints in the system.
Hope this makes sense,
Simon
---
Simon Kinsella
Technical Director - Bluefire Systems Ltd This message has been scanned for
viruses.
--
That sounds like a plan - will give it a go. Thanks!
simon
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:37 AM
To: Simon Kinsella
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Possible to emulate pre-8.2 behaviour of SET CONSTRAINTS
10 matches
Mail list logo