On Sun, 01 July 2001, Risto Järvinen wrote:
...
> While I'm at it, I'd recommend trying to port PicoGUI to uClibc. glibc2
> is bloated (libuClibc.so is only ~150kB). OTOH uClibc is limited but at
> least busybox runs under it, so why not PicoGUI too. Though at the moment
> there is only partia
On Sat, 30 June 2001, Risto Järvinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you considered using unix domain sockets for client-server
> communications?
I have been planning to implement domain sockets all along, just haven't got around to
it.
What I'll (eventually?) get around to doing is modularizing the
Unix socket is a good idea. It will surely be included.
By the way, PicoGUI already run on uClinux.
-philippe
> While I'm at it, I'd recommend trying to port PicoGUI to uClibc. glibc2
> is bloated (libuClibc.so is only ~150kB). OTOH uClibc is limited but at
> least busybox runs under it, so wh
>
> Without TCP:
> System is 481 kB
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 496215 Jul 1 11:02 bzImage
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1519072 Jul 1 11:02 vmlinux
>
> With TCP:
> System is 572 kB
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 589503 Jul 1 11:07 bzImage
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root roo
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Shane Nay wrote:
> On Saturday 30 June 2001 16:14, Risto Järvinen wrote:
> > Have you considered using unix domain sockets for client-server
> > communications?
>
> Config option makes sense mostly for cutting down on kernel size.
I did a preliminary measurement with Linux/x
On Saturday 30 June 2001 16:14, Risto Järvinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you considered using unix domain sockets for client-server
> communications?
Config option makes sense mostly for cutting down on kernel size.
Thanks,
Shane Nay.
___
Pgui-devel maili
