projectVALIS wrote:
I'm wondering if there are online API docs like there are for Java (here's a
link http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/ for all you non-Java
types). I've already got a copy of 'Pharo by Example' and 'A Guide to Work
with Squeak Morph Classes', but neither are what I'm
perfect! this is enough to get me going -- thanks!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/API-docs-tp4716945p4717010.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ok I was not aware you were thinking about that. So this is good to have this
path in my radar.
Yes, this is actually what we discussed recently with Esteban about possible
alternatives and
low-hanging fruits :)
I like these ones :)
Concerning ARM:
- Damien Pollet works on ARM
yes, people are not willing to change code all the time…
We are willing to change the code where there is a clear benefit. For example
it's hard to argue that the new filesystem is an improvement over
FileDirectory. We have a partically working Spec based UI for the servers. We
would
tx!
On Oct 24, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Torsten Bergmann asta...@gmx.de wrote:
From the comments I think we can agree that it is a better to have a lint rule
instead of breaking things the way it was introduced by the original issue
#11876.
I therefore opened an issue
With respect to Seaside (and its cross-platform-ness), this is probably a
good decision, for now.
But it is fundamentally unfair to call this an arbitrary unimportant change
meant to annoy people. On the contrary ! I even think that there are too many
methods in TAssertable and the
this is what I do for the PharoTopics :)
On Oct 24, 2013, at 4:17 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2013 20:21, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
This is really cool, is that in the image already ?
What about plain HTTP repos ?
indeed, what could be
rant
It's part of the Pharo manifesto: Not backward compatible
/rant
Levente I hope that writing this little pun created some jubilation to you. Or
I do not understand your point.
But this is ok for me. If pun on Pharo helps you then this is ok and they make
me smile, and I'm serious
If I
On 25 oct. 2013, at 09:50, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
I was only use in stupid halos and the code is not really good.
Now if somebody does a pass on it we could readd it to the basis. (right now
I just put it back for the sound package - but the sound package shows it
So action=create object=directory
you want to be sure that you create a directory?
What if it already exists?
Since you want to be sure to create, will you erase and re-create?
You see the kind of misunderstanding this could create...
IOW, self ensureCreateMisunderstanding
2013/10/25 Stéphane
Am 25.10.2013 um 10:11 schrieb Nicolas Cellier
nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com:
So action=create object=directory
you want to be sure that you create a directory?
What if it already exists?
Since you want to be sure to create, will you erase and re-create?
You see the kind of
Hi,
This method in DeepCopier has no senders (in Pharo 3) and it's the only who
references the class variable NextVariableCheckTime.
The time stamp says 1999... Unused code to remove?
isItTimeToCheckVariables
| now isIt |
NextVariableCheckTime ifNil: [
NextVariableCheckTime := Time
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: ee26c3a454be5ecb199f0447700a856def4bde24
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/ee26c3a454be5ecb199f0447700a856def4bde24
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/30521
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Yes, this can be cleanup up.
On 25 Oct 2013 at 11:10:34, Martin Dias (tinchod...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
This method in DeepCopier has no senders (in Pharo 3) and it's the only who
references the class variable NextVariableCheckTime.
The time stamp says 1999... Unused code to remove?
Branch: refs/tags/30522
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 30a35f96d7a19a6c2d1c95ff359c2cdaa1dde9bf
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/30a35f96d7a19a6c2d1c95ff359c2cdaa1dde9bf
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Reported:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12002/DeepCopier-isItTimeToCheckVariables-is-candidate-to-be-removed
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.frwrote:
Yes, this can be cleanup up.
On 25 Oct 2013 at 11:10:34, Martin Dias
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 4021f31ef110a3f16862ef02329c66f4e04ffa40
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/4021f31ef110a3f16862ef02329c66f4e04ffa40
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/30523
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On 25 Oct 2013 at 11:16:35, Goubier Thierry (thierry.goub...@cea.fr) wrote:
Hi all,
has anybody noticed that, when getting node positions from a RB parse of
the AST, they seem to be off by one character or more? It happens in
smart suggestions type of commands for me, but it seems to also
can we focus on real problems?
The method has a comment.
Stef
On Oct 25, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Norbert Hartl norb...@hartl.name wrote:
Am 25.10.2013 um 10:11 schrieb Nicolas Cellier
nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com:
So action=create object=directory
you want to be sure that you create a
Why do we need to remove configurations of projects loaded into the image?
I would say the opposite: all projects in the image should have their
configuration loaded. It is part of the project.
Le 25 oct. 2013 à 14:00, GitHub a écrit :
12005 unload BaselineOfFileTree, BaselineOfMetacello
Branch: refs/tags/30524
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: fdec0d85c64952aa500fd73ab1818bbcec3c8ae8
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/fdec0d85c64952aa500fd73ab1818bbcec3c8ae8
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
What are real problems exactly?
If you are going to open each and every method to read the comment or the
code instead of trusting the name, IMHO that is going to be a real problem.
If the focus shall be on real problems, then why change APIs which are not
a real problem?
2013/10/25 Stéphane
Stef,
I really don’t want to stretch this into an argue …. but I have problems
understanding that. There are refactorings of method selectors because it is
said it is important that includesSubString: is written as includesSubstring:
and there are other examples. Now we have a selector that
Le 25/10/2013 15:27, Marcus Denker a écrit :
... even with the package tags there is too much in the left pane.
Yes, I've seen that as well.
Either go into the six pane browser of S. Travis Pope, or use the tree
to build proper categories of packages like I do in the AltBrowser. I.e.
We already discussed this API
it is in the bug tracker: ensureDelete, ensureDeleted….
So do what you want I personally want to focus on more important issues.
Once the full world will agree then do not forget to update the FileSystem
Chapter
that I wrote BTW (this is for the people complaining
Yes, I can understand the boring part of it
- this is a detail
- it's tiring to discuss small details to death
- some people speak more than act (me for example :)
But can we agree that
- details count
- critics count (convince yourself that they are not intended for bashing
people)
- and last
On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Nicolas Cellier
nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com wrote:
What are real problems exactly?
Here is a list
- better API for Compiler
- better functionality for OPAL
- Cleaning Morph (architecture, package structure)
- using Slot for
The problem with #ensure style selectors is that they are confusing because
they both test something and maybe do something to create a certain condition.
The only way to take away the confusion is to make a very long selector. That
is why comments are also important.
Like Stef said, this was
Martin watching the DeepCopier???
I am afraid to ask why ;)
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Martin Dias tinchod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This method in DeepCopier has no senders (in Pharo 3) and it's the only
who references the class variable NextVariableCheckTime.
The time stamp
20625
-
11535 RBBrowserEnvironment packages method is too broad backport
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11535
Diff information:
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Pharo20/Refactoring-Environment-MarcusDenker.14.diff
Am 25.10.2013 um 15:52 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu:
The problem with #ensure style selectors is that they are confusing because
they both test something and maybe do something to create a certain
condition. The only way to take away the confusion is to make a very long
Branch: refs/heads/2.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: ccaa8405f452676d149e42759a742dc3db2c9ea5
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/ccaa8405f452676d149e42759a742dc3db2c9ea5
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Hi guys,
can you give me http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk rights to commit to
Pharo30Inbox?
Cheers!
Uko
Branch: refs/tags/20625
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
xD
yes, DeepCopier, our old friend!
but it's not about replacing by Fuel or something like that.
It was just a random pick for fix a triviality a day, what Marcus
proposed some weeks ago.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
marianop...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin
+1
The problem with #ensure style selectors is that they are confusing because
they both test something and maybe do something to create a certain
condition. The only way to take away the confusion is to make a very long
selector. That is why comments are also important.
Like Stef
It looks cool :)
Now I was wondering why Canvas and friends are part of it and not into Graphics
Stef
Indeed I'm all in favor to have ConfigurationOf in the image because they are
metaData of the packages
and projects!!!
I do not understand why UI concerns show up into structure of the system.
I do not see why having a long list is a problem:
there is a search behavior
there is
Hi
I just pushed a change cleaning some strange usage.
BitBlt was sometimes invoked via BitBlt current (which just returned the BitBlt
class).
Apparently in Squeak they removed it too.
Now it touches Fuel so Fuel guys can you merge on your side too?
I added you as a contributor there
On 25 Oct 2013 at 16:11:09, Yuriy Tymchuk (yuriy.tymc...@me.com) wrote:
Hi guys,
can you give me http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk rights to commit to
Pharo30Inbox?
Cheers!
Uko
On it!
On 25.10.2013, at 16:26, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
I just pushed a change cleaning some strange usage.
BitBlt was sometimes invoked via BitBlt current (which just returned the
BitBlt class).
Apparently in Squeak they removed it too.
Now it touches
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
rant
It's part of the Pharo manifesto: Not backward compatible
/rant
Levente I hope that writing this little pun created some jubilation to you. Or
I do not understand your point.
But this is ok for me. If pun on Pharo helps you then this is ok
If I remember correctly andreas wrote the tests.
I always like them.
Stef
The author of the test is Andreas Raab, but I'm not sure who found it
(excavating mailing list is hard work)
2013/10/25 Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com
On 25 October 2013 00:26, Nicolas Cellier
I'm sorry if you guys didn't get my message, but it was as serious as it
could be.
Ok fair :)
I understand that you don't what to be backwards compatible, because it makes
it easier to change stuff.
As I see, people need various levels of backwards compatibility.
Indeed but the right
Hello,
I was wondering what the state of Aspect programming was in Pharo.
Googling a bit turned the title mentioned projects.
Do we anything loadable and more or less stable for Pharo2.x?
I'd like to use some of that.
TIA
Phil
30525
-
- Issue: 12009 BitBlt current - BitBlt
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12009/BitBlt-current-BitBlt
- Issue: 12013: Zinc Character Encoding and Resource Meta update
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12013/
- Issue: 12014 Extract History from
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 61fb24eb5859e30b04a664958cb7bda70de6dcce
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/61fb24eb5859e30b04a664958cb7bda70de6dcce
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Not really and frankly I would not use that.
What is your case?
Stef
Hello,
I was wondering what the state of Aspect programming was in Pharo.
Googling a bit turned the title mentioned projects.
Do we anything loadable and more or less stable for Pharo2.x?
I'd like to use some of
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I'm sorry if you guys didn't get my message, but it was as serious as it could
be.
Ok fair :)
I understand that you don't what to be backwards compatible, because it makes
it easier to change stuff.
As I see, people need various levels of
We should not continue this old discussion. We've already debated
this ad naseum. Thank you Pharo guys for exploring what can be done
when all constraints are removed! Thank you Squeak guys for advancing
in a way that caters to legacy applications.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Levente
Branch: refs/tags/30525
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Branch: refs/tags/30526
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 9e65f148f79b2b0c5c30be76e1b30818bae4003e
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/9e65f148f79b2b0c5c30be76e1b30818bae4003e
Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org
Date:
Hi guys,
Just a small note that the sources file for Pharo2.0 (and 3.0) is not easy to
get when downloading the VM and the image from the website.
I had to finally download the ‘one click’ and extract the sources file from its
resources.
I believe they used to be included with the image zips.
Hi Johan,
On 25 Oct 2013, at 22:55, Johan Brichau jo...@inceptive.be wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a small note that the sources file for Pharo2.0 (and 3.0) is not easy to
get when downloading the VM and the image from the website.
I had to finally download the ‘one click’ and extract the
Hey Sven,
Thanks for these alternatives.
I guess I’m an old-fashioned website user :-)
cheers
Johan
On 25 Oct 2013, at 23:07, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
Hi Johan,
On 25 Oct 2013, at 22:55, Johan Brichau jo...@inceptive.be wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a small note that the
I am interested in aspects as for crosscutting concerns they are useful.
I am now using Traits in my code and it works well indeed. The problem with
them is that I have to pepper them around in classes where with aspects, I
could define pointcuts in a single place with definitions (I used that in
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Johan Brichau wrote:
Hey Sven,
Thanks for these alternatives.
I guess I’m an old-fashioned website user :-)
I had the same problem today. I found them a few clicks away from the
general download page at http://files.pharo.org/sources/
Levente
cheers
Johan
On 25
62 matches
Mail list logo
